These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Use of mobility subscale for risk assessment of pressure ulcer incidence and preventive interventions: A systematic review. Mordiffi SZ; Kent B; Phillips N; Chi Tho P JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2011; 9(56):2417-2481. PubMed ID: 27820427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis. Liao Y; Gao G; Mo L Int J Nurs Sci; 2018 Oct; 5(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 31406858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interrater Reliability of the Braden and Braden Q by Skin Champion Nurses. Riccioni N; Berlanga R; Hagan J; Schier R; Gordon M J Pediatr Nurs; 2019; 44():9-15. PubMed ID: 30683286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Use of risk scales for decubitus ulcers as screening instruments--A systematic review of external evidence]. Schlömer G Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Feb; 97(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 12669688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis. He W; Liu P; Chen HL Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Psychometric analysis of subjective sedation scales used for critically ill paediatric patients. Ge X; Zhang T; Zhou L Nurs Crit Care; 2018 Jan; 23(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 29131465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating the development and validation of empirically-derived prognostic models for pressure ulcer risk assessment: A systematic review. Shi C; Dumville JC; Cullum N Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Jan; 89():88-103. PubMed ID: 30352322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. O'Tuathail C; Taqi R Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. PubMed ID: 21471902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting. Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Interrater reliability of the Braden scale]. Kottner J; Tannen A; Dassen T Pflege; 2008 Apr; 21(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 18622997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability and validity of the Braden Scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk. Kring DL J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 17667086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care. Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk. Cremasco MF; Wenzel F; Zanei SS; Whitaker IY J Clin Nurs; 2013 Aug; 22(15-16):2183-91. PubMed ID: 23216694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk: a meta-analysis]. Park SH; Park YS J Korean Acad Nurs; 2014 Dec; 44(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 25608538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting Pressure Ulcer Development in Clinical Practice: Evaluation of Braden Scale Scores and Nutrition Parameters. Miller N; Frankenfield D; Lehman E; Maguire M; Schirm V J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2016; 43(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 26680628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. Kottner J; Dassen T Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]