These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21646984)

  • 1. Relationship between standardized patient checklist item accuracy and performing arts experience.
    Langenau EE; Dyer C; Roberts WL; De Champlain AF; Montrey DP; Sandella JM
    Simul Healthc; 2011 Jun; 6(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 21646984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Checklist agreement between standardized patients and faculty.
    Kopp KC; Johnson JA
    J Dent Educ; 1995 Aug; 59(8):824-9. PubMed ID: 7499599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of item and rater characteristics on checklist recording: what should we look for?
    Huber P; Baroffio A; Chamot E; Herrmann F; Nendaz MR; Vu NV
    Med Educ; 2005 Aug; 39(8):852-8. PubMed ID: 16048628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between experience with standardized patient examinations and subsequent standardized patient examination performance: a potential problem with standardized patient exam validity.
    Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Mar; 30(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 17293609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
    Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing traditional and computer-based training methods for standardized patients.
    Errichetti A; Boulet JR
    Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S91-4. PubMed ID: 17001146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Checklist content on a standardized patient assessment: an ex post facto review.
    Boulet JR; van Zanten M; de Champlain A; Hawkins RE; Peitzman SJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16871427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of "standardized examinees" in a standardized-patient examination of clinical skills.
    Pangaro LN; Worth-Dickstein H; Macmillan MK; Klass DJ; Shatzer JH
    Acad Med; 1997 Nov; 72(11):1008-11. PubMed ID: 9387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of medical education on students' patient-satisfaction ratings.
    Klamen DL; Williams RG
    Acad Med; 1997 Jan; 72(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 9008571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of standardised patients, record abstraction and clinical vignettes for the purpose of measuring clinical practice.
    Shah R; Edgar DF; Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):209-24. PubMed ID: 20444128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination.
    Srinivasan M; Hauer KE; Der-Martirosian C; Wilkes M; Gesundheit N
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 17727526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of standardized patients to evaluate family medicine resident decision making.
    Terry R; Hiester E; James GD
    Fam Med; 2007 Apr; 39(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 17401770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of repeat information on examinee performance for a large-scale standardized-patient examination.
    Swygert KA; Balog KP; Jobe A
    Acad Med; 2010 Sep; 85(9):1506-10. PubMed ID: 20736678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lecture versus standardized patient interaction in the surgical clerkship: a randomized prospective cross-over study.
    Carter MB; Wesley G; Larson GM
    Am J Surg; 2006 Feb; 191(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 16442957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
    Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State of the art in standardized patient programs: a survey of osteopathic medical schools.
    Errichetti AM; Gimpel JR; Boulet JR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2002 Nov; 102(11):627-31. PubMed ID: 12462308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the head-to-toe physical examination skills of medical students.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing S; Klamen D; Valaski M; Eulenberg B; Popa M
    Med Teach; 2004 Aug; 26(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 15369880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: a comparison study.
    Hatala R; Issenberg SB; Kassen B; Cole G; Bacchus CM; Scalese RJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 18221269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of standardized patients' performance in a study of clinical decision making.
    Badger LW; deGruy F; Hartman J; Plant MA; Leeper J; Ficken R; Templeton B; Nutt L
    Fam Med; 1995 Feb; 27(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 7737446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing validity of standardized patient ratings of medical students' communication behavior using the Roter interaction analysis system.
    Price EG; Windish DM; Magaziner J; Cooper LA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18037602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.