BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21649813)

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines - 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study.
    Ascher B; Bayerl C; Brun P; Kestemont P; Rzany B; Poncet M; Guennoun M; Podda M
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2011 Jun; 10(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 21649813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of moderate nasolabial folds: 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study.
    Rzany B; Bayerl C; Bodokh I; Boineau D; Dirschka T; Queille-Roussel C; Sebastian M; Sommer B; Poncet M; Guennoun M; Podda M
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Jun; 13(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 21609212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler in the correction of nasolabial folds: a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face study.
    Rhee do Y; Won CH; Chang SE; Noh TK; Kim MS; Kim BJ; Park GH; An JS; Lee MW; Choi JH; Moon KC; Lim SH
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2014 Oct; 25(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 23789873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold.
    Suh JH; Oh CT; Im SI; Lim JS; Kim BJ; Lee JH
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(3):327-332. PubMed ID: 28145073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-center comparative efficacy and safety study of two different hyaluronic acid fillers for treatment of nasolabial folds in a Chinese population.
    Li D; Sun J; Wu S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2019 Jun; 18(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 31074161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and effectiveness of small and large gel-particle hyaluronic acid in the correction of perioral wrinkles.
    Brandt F; Bassichis B; Bassichis M; O'Connell C; Lin X
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 10(9):982-7. PubMed ID: 22052266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of injection with poly-L-lactic acid compared with hyaluronic acid for correction of nasolabial fold: a randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparative study.
    Hyun MY; Lee Y; No YA; Yoo KH; Kim MN; Hong CK; Chang SE; Won CH; Kim BJ
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2015 Mar; 40(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 25319932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and safety of two hyaluronic acid fillers with different injection depths for the correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds: A 52-week, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study in a Chinese population.
    Hu Y; Liu Z; Wang Y; Yu Q; Gong Y; Diao H; Jin Y; Zhang S; Shi Y
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Mar; 21(3):940-948. PubMed ID: 35020250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The efficacy and safety of a monophasic hyaluronic acid filler in the correction of nasolabial folds: A randomized, multicenter, single blinded, split-face study.
    Kwon HJ; Ko EJ; Choi SY; Choi EJ; Jang YJ; Kim BJ; Lee YW
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 17(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 28913927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study.
    Choi WJ; Han SW; Kim JE; Kim HW; Kim MB; Kang H
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):953-62. PubMed ID: 26493557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized, Patient/Evaluator-Blinded, Intraindividual Comparison Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler in the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds.
    Hong JY; Choi EJ; Choi SY; Li K; Kim BJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2018 Apr; 44(4):542-548. PubMed ID: 29543617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An 18-Month Follow-up, Randomized Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Treatment of Moderate Nasolabial Folds.
    Rzany B; Bayerl C; Bodokh I; Boineau D; Dirschka T; Queille-Roussel C; Sebastian M; Sommer B; Edwartz C; Podda M
    Dermatol Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 27673483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new dermal filler made of cross-linked and auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid in the correction of facial aging defects.
    Sparavigna A; Fino P; Tenconi B; Giordan N; Amorosi V; Scuderi N
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2014 Dec; 13(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 25399623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison between two hyaluronic acid-derived fillers in the treatment of nasolabial folds in Chinese subjects: BioHyalux versus Restylane.
    Wu Y; Sun N; Xu Y; Liu H; Zhong S; Chen L; Li D
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2016 Apr; 308(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 26924549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds.
    Lindqvist C; Tveten S; Bondevik BE; Fagrell D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jan; 115(1):282-9. PubMed ID: 15622265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized comparison of the efficacy of low volume deep placement cheek injection vs. mid- to deep dermal nasolabial fold injection technique for the correction of nasolabial folds.
    Goodier M; Elm K; Wallander I; Zelickson B; Schram S
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2014 Jun; 13(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 24910271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of a monophasic cohesive polydensified matrix versus a biphasic nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid filler after single injection in nasolabial folds.
    Buntrock H; Reuther T; Prager W; Kerscher M
    Dermatol Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1097-105. PubMed ID: 23506356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid filler for nasolabial folds: A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, evaluator/subject-blind, split-face study.
    Cheon HI; Kim JH; Kim BJ; Lee YW
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 May; 20(5):1467-1473. PubMed ID: 33085170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy and Safety of Two Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A 64-Week, Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blinded, and Within-Subject Study.
    Monheit G; Kaufman-Janette J; Joseph JH; Shamban A; Dover JS; Smith S
    Dermatol Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 32217842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical comparison of two hyaluronic acid-derived fillers in the treatment of nasolabial folds: Mesoglow® and IAL System®.
    Ahn JY; Lee SH; Park KY; Hong CK; Song HJ; Park MY; Choi YS; Seo SJ
    Int J Dermatol; 2012 May; 51(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 22515587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.