256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21652198)
21. Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells.
Yi H; Nevin KP; Kim BC; Franks AE; Klimes A; Tender LM; Lovley DR
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Aug; 24(12):3498-503. PubMed ID: 19487117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiple paths of electron flow to current in microbial electrolysis cells fed with low and high concentrations of propionate.
Hari AR; Katuri KP; Gorron E; Logan BE; Saikaly PE
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 100(13):5999-6011. PubMed ID: 26936773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Geobacter sp. SD-1 with enhanced electrochemical activity in high-salt concentration solutions.
Sun D; Call D; Wang A; Cheng S; Logan BE
Environ Microbiol Rep; 2014 Dec; 6(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 25756125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bioaugmentation of microbial electrolysis cells with Geobacter sulfurreducens YM18 for enhanced hydrogen production from starch.
Ochiai I; Harada T; Jomori S; Kouzuma A; Watanabe K
Bioresour Technol; 2023 Oct; 386():129508. PubMed ID: 37468016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Methanogenesis in membraneless microbial electrolysis cells.
Clauwaert P; Verstraete W
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Apr; 82(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 19050859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimal set anode potentials vary in bioelectrochemical systems.
Wagner RC; Call DF; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(16):6036-41. PubMed ID: 20704197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Change in microbial communities in acetate- and glucose-fed microbial fuel cells in the presence of light.
Xing D; Cheng S; Regan JM; Logan BE
Biosens Bioelectron; 2009 Sep; 25(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 19574034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Consolidated bioprocessing of AFEX-pretreated corn stover to ethanol and hydrogen in a microbial electrolysis cell.
Speers AM; Reguera G
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7875-81. PubMed ID: 22697183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A μL-scale micromachined microbial fuel cell having high power density.
Choi S; Lee HS; Yang Y; Parameswaran P; Torres CI; Rittmann BE; Chae J
Lab Chip; 2011 Mar; 11(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 21311808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of Anode Potentials on Current Generation and Extracellular Electron Transfer Paths of Geobacter Species.
Kato S
Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 28067820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Electricity generation using membrane and salt bridge microbial fuel cells.
Min B; Cheng S; Logan BE
Water Res; 2005 May; 39(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 15899266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Enhancement of hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell through anode arrangement optimization.
Liang DW; Peng SK; Lu SF; Liu YY; Lan F; Xiang Y
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Dec; 102(23):10881-5. PubMed ID: 21974881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of a pilot-scale continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell fed winery wastewater.
Cusick RD; Bryan B; Parker DS; Merrill MD; Mehanna M; Kiely PD; Liu G; Logan BE
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Mar; 89(6):2053-63. PubMed ID: 21305277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Platinum Group Metal-free Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
Yuan H; He Z
Chem Rec; 2017 Jul; 17(7):641-652. PubMed ID: 28375578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High surface area stainless steel brushes as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells.
Call DF; Merrill MD; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Mar; 43(6):2179-83. PubMed ID: 19368232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microbial community composition is unaffected by anode potential.
Zhu X; Yates MD; Hatzell MC; Ananda Rao H; Saikaly PE; Logan BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jan; 48(2):1352-8. PubMed ID: 24364567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new insight into potential regulation on growth and power generation of Geobacter sulfurreducens in microbial fuel cells based on energy viewpoint.
Wei J; Liang P; Cao X; Huang X
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(8):3187-91. PubMed ID: 20345152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors.
Jung S; Regan JM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 17786426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of volatile fatty acids on microbial electrolysis cell performance.
Yang N; Hafez H; Nakhla G
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 193():449-55. PubMed ID: 26159302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Significance of biological hydrogen oxidation in a continuous single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell.
Lee HS; Rittmann BE
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(3):948-54. PubMed ID: 20030379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
