These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Inbreeding effects in a mixed-mating vine: effects of mating history, pollen competition and stress on the cost of inbreeding. Opedal ØH; Armbruster WS; Pélabon C AoB Plants; 2015 Nov; 7():. PubMed ID: 26578744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence for inbreeding depression and post-pollination selection against inbreeding in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Teixeira S; Foerster K; Bernasconi G Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Feb; 102(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 18698334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does stronger pollen competition improve offspring fitness when pollen load does not vary? Pélabon C; Hennet L; Bolstad GH; Albertsen E; Opedal ØH; Ekrem RK; Armbruster WS Am J Bot; 2016 Mar; 103(3):522-31. PubMed ID: 26451034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of inbreeding on traits that influence dispersal and progeny density in Cakile edentula var. lacustris (Brassicaceae). Donohue K Am J Bot; 1998 May; 85(5):661. PubMed ID: 21684947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of floral display size and biparental inbreeding on outcrossing rates in Delphinium barbeyi (Ranunculaceae). Williams CF Am J Bot; 2007 Oct; 94(10):1696-705. PubMed ID: 21636366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in an 'old rare' bumblebee-pollinated grassland herb. Becker T; Voss N; Durka W Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2011 Nov; 13(6):857-64. PubMed ID: 21972799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of pleiotropy between viability and pollen fates on mating system evolution. Jordan CY Theor Popul Biol; 2015 Feb; 99():7-17. PubMed ID: 25448089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does multiple paternity affect seed mass in angiosperms? An experimental test in Dalechampia scandens. Pélabon C; Albertsen E; Falahati-Anbaran M; Wright J; Armbruster WS J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1719-33. PubMed ID: 26174371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anther and stigma morphology in mirror-image flowers of Chamaecrista chamaecristoides (Fabaceae): implications for buzz pollination. Arceo-Gómez G; Martínez ML; Parra-Tabla V; García-Franco JG Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2011 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():19-24. PubMed ID: 21134083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of pollen quantity and quality on reproduction and offspring vigor in the rare plant Scorzonera humilis (Asteraceae). Colling G; Reckinger C; Matthies D Am J Bot; 2004 Nov; 91(11):1774-82. PubMed ID: 21652324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection on pollen and pistil traits during pollen competition is affected by both sexual conflict and mixed mating in a self-compatible herb. Lankinen Å; Smith HG; Andersson S; Madjidian JA Am J Bot; 2016 Mar; 103(3):541-52. PubMed ID: 26542842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. Porcher E; Lande R J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 15842479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative and qualitative consequences of reduced pollen loads in a mixed-mating plant. Hildesheim LS; Opedal ØH; Armbruster WS; Pélabon C Ecol Evol; 2019 Dec; 9(24):14253-14260. PubMed ID: 31938516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). Paschke M; Abs C; Schmid B Am J Bot; 2002 Aug; 89(8):1250-9. PubMed ID: 21665726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competition drives specialization in pollination systems through costs to male fitness. Muchhala N; Brown Z; Armbruster WS; Potts MD Am Nat; 2010 Dec; 176(6):732-43. PubMed ID: 20954889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of mating system and the genetic covariance between male and female investment in Clarkia (onagraceae): selfing opposes the evolution of trade-offs. Mazer SJ; Delesalle VA; Paz H Evolution; 2007 Jan; 61(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 17300429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanisms and evolution of deceptive pollination in orchids. Jersáková J; Johnson SD; Kindlmann P Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 May; 81(2):219-35. PubMed ID: 16677433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pollinator directionality as a response to nectar gradient: promoting outcrossing while avoiding geitonogamy. Fisogni A; Cristofolini G; Rossi M; Galloni M Plant Biol (Stuttg); 2011 Nov; 13(6):848-56. PubMed ID: 21972840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]