These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21652503)

  • 1. Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: an evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices.
    Harris JR
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 21652503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness and reliability of peer-marking in first-year medical students.
    English R; Brookes ST; Avery K; Blazeby JM; Ben-Shlomo Y
    Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 40(10):965-72. PubMed ID: 16987186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning through multiple lenses: analysis of self, peer, near-peer and faculty assessment of a clinical history taking task in Australia.
    Fitzgerald K; Vaughan B
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():22. PubMed ID: 30223639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer assessment: Development and delivery of the OSCE.
    McKay A; McCall J; Cairns AM
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2023 May; 27(2):234-239. PubMed ID: 35263022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer assessment among first year medical students in anatomy.
    Spandorfer J; Puklus T; Rose V; Vahedi M; Collins L; Giordano C; Schmidt R; Braster C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 23959790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.
    Papinczak T; Young L; Groves M; Haynes M
    Med Teach; 2007 Jun; 29(5):e122-32. PubMed ID: 17885964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midwifery students' evaluation of team-based academic assignments involving peer-marking.
    Parratt JA; Fahy KM; Hastie CR
    Women Birth; 2014 Mar; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 24200860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-evaluation and peer-feedback of medical students' communication skills using a web-based video annotation system. Exploring content and specificity.
    Hulsman RL; van der Vloodt J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Mar; 98(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 25433967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of marking of peer marking in oral presentation.
    Steverding D; Tyler KM; Sexton DW
    Perspect Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 5(2):103-107. PubMed ID: 26951165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing Professionalism via Multisource Feedback in Team-Based Learning.
    Emke AR; Cheng S; Dufault C; Cianciolo AT; Musick D; Richards B; Violato C
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 26507992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The summer premedical program for matriculating medical students: a student-led initiative.
    Awad AM; Alamodi AA; Shareef MA; Alsheikh AJ; Mahmoud AI; Daghistany AO; Hijazi MM; Abu-Zaid A; Alsadoon M; Shabllout M; Rasool A; Yaqinuddin A
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24585471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leniency and halo effects in marking undergraduate short research projects.
    McKinstry BH; Cameron HS; Elton RA; Riley SC
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Nov; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 15569395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experiences with audio feedback in a veterinary curriculum.
    Rhind SM; Pettigrew GW; Spiller J; Pearson GT
    J Vet Med Educ; 2013; 40(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 23470242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Staff and student perceptions of computer-assisted assessment for physiology practical classes.
    Sheader E; Gouldsborough I; Grady R
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2006 Dec; 30(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 17108245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study.
    Nofziger AC; Naumburg EH; Davis BJ; Mooney CJ; Epstein RM
    Acad Med; 2010 Jan; 85(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 20042840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer-led training and assessment in basic life support for healthcare students: synthesis of literature review and fifteen years practical experience.
    Harvey PR; Higenbottam CV; Owen A; Hulme J; Bion JF
    Resuscitation; 2012 Jul; 83(7):894-9. PubMed ID: 22285723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is peer assessment an effective learning tool in an internationally and educationally heterogeneous cohort of students?
    Park C; Quick T
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2020; 33(3):108-113. PubMed ID: 33727500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online assessment: what influences students to engage with feedback?
    Stone A
    Clin Teach; 2014 Jul; 11(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 24917098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development, Evaluation, and Evolution of a Peer Support Program in Veterinary Medical Education.
    Spielman S; Hughes K; Rhind S
    J Vet Med Educ; 2015; 42(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 26075623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.