274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21652509)
1. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology.
DeHoff ME; Clark KL; Meganathan K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Mar; 35(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21386004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The implementation of clay modeling and rat dissection into the human anatomy and physiology curriculum of a large urban community college.
Haspel C; Motoike HK; Lenchner E
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23650279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study.
Motoike HK; O'Kane RL; Lenchner E; Haspel C
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 19189347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cat dissection vs. sculpting human structures in clay: an analysis of two approaches to undergraduate human anatomy laboratory education.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Mar; 29(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15718380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
Granger NA; Calleson D
Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers.
Wright SJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22362500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
Hisley KC; Anderson LD; Smith SE; Kavic SM; Tracy JK
Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Student laboratory presentations as a learning tool in anatomy education.
Chollet MB; Teaford MF; Garofalo EM; DeLeon VB
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(6):260-4. PubMed ID: 19810121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding protein synthesis: a role-play approach in large undergraduate human anatomy and physiology classes.
Sturges D; Maurer TW; Cole O
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Jun; 33(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 19509395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing knowledge of human gross anatomy in medical school: an applied contextual-learning theory method.
Clough RW; Lehr RP
Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 8793222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory.
Brueckner JK; MacPherson BR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 May; 8(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 15059083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change.
Patel KM; Moxham BJ
Clin Anat; 2006 Mar; 19(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 16302246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: by dissection and from prosections.
Nnodim JO; Ohanaka EC; Osuji CU
Clin Anat; 1996; 9(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 8793221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prof-in-a-Box: using internet-videoconferencing to assist students in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Moorman SJ
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 6():55. PubMed ID: 17107621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissection videos do not improve anatomy examination scores.
Mahmud W; Hyder O; Butt J; Aftab A
Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21265032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: the implications for anatomy and dissection.
Marks SC
Clin Anat; 2000; 13(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 11111898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Student-centered integrated anatomy resource sessions at Alfaisal University.
Cowan M; Arain NN; Assale TS; Assi AH; Albar RA; Ganguly PK
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 20814913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
