273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21652509)
21. Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism.
Camp CL; Gregory JK; Lachman N; Chen LP; Juskewitch JE; Pawlina W
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 20213851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of the human dissection experience on subsequent related course work.
Ager CL
Am J Occup Ther; 1979 Dec; 33(12):776-8. PubMed ID: 532772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of the effectiveness of dissection and prosection on short-term anatomic knowledge retention in a reciprocal peer-teaching program.
Lackey-Cornelison WL; Bauler LD; Smith J
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Jun; 44(2):239-246. PubMed ID: 32412383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clay modeling versus written modules as effective interventions in understanding human anatomy.
Bareither ML; Arbel V; Growe M; Muszczynski E; Rudd A; Marone JR
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 23027681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses.
Olson BL; McDonald JL
J Dent Educ; 2004 Jun; 68(6):656-9. PubMed ID: 15217084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Undergraduate coursework in anatomy as a predictor of performance: comparison between students taking a medical gross anatomy course of average length and a course shortened by curriculum reform.
Peterson CA; Tucker RP
Clin Anat; 2005 Oct; 18(7):540-7. PubMed ID: 16015636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images.
Khalil MK; Paas F; Johnson TE; Su YK; Payer AF
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19177385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Near-peer driven dissection selective: A primer to the medical school anatomy course.
Cantwell S; Bonadurer GF; Pawlina W; Lachman N
Clin Anat; 2015 Nov; 28(8):985-93. PubMed ID: 26375596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching.
Johnson JH
Clin Anat; 2002 Jan; 15(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 11835543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory.
Bentley BS; Hill RV
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):143-9. PubMed ID: 19637291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Doing dissections differently: a structured, peer-assisted learning approach to maximizing learning in dissections.
Hall ER; Davis RC; Weller R; Powney S; Williams SB
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 22899585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Online vs classroom instruction: student satisfaction and learning outcomes in an undergraduate Allied Health pharmacology course.
Hale LS; Mirakian EA; Day DB
J Allied Health; 2009; 38(2):e36-42. PubMed ID: 19753411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Krych AJ; March CN; Bryan RE; Peake BJ; Pawlina W; Carmichael SW
Clin Anat; 2005 May; 18(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 15832347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An interactive method for teaching anatomy of the human eye for medical students in ophthalmology clinical rotations.
Kivell TL; Doyle SK; Madden RH; Mitchell TL; Sims EL
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19637292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Anatomy curriculum for medical students: what can be learned for future curricula from evaluations and questionnaires completed by students, anatomists and clinicians in different countries?
Pabst R
Ann Anat; 2009 Dec; 191(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 19836220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models.
Oh CS; Kim JY; Choe YH
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 19588481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists.
Patel KM; Moxham BJ
Clin Anat; 2008 Mar; 21(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 18189277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Student perception of a new integrated anatomy practical program: does students' prior learning make a difference?
Tedman RA; Alexander H; Massa H; Moses D
Clin Anat; 2011 Jul; 24(5):664-70. PubMed ID: 21438022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning in an introductory anatomy and physiology course with a diverse student population.
Brown PJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Sep; 34(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 20826770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
