These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21653913)

  • 1. Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.
    Loney GC; Torregrossa AM; Smith JC; Sclafani A; Eckel LA
    Chem Senses; 2011 Oct; 36(8):733-45. PubMed ID: 21653913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.
    Loney GC; Torregrossa AM; Carballo C; Eckel LA
    Chem Senses; 2012 Jun; 37(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 22281530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.
    Torregrossa AM; Loney GC; Smith JC; Eckel LA
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():96-103. PubMed ID: 25497078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Sclafani A; Clare RA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 15269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability of individual differences in sucralose taste preference.
    Bacharach SZ; Calu DJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216431. PubMed ID: 31086418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.
    Loney GC; Blonde GD; Eckel LA; Spector AC
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 32(29):10086-92. PubMed ID: 22815522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Pattern of Fos-Like Immunoreactivity Expressed Within the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Is Associated With Individual Variation in the Taste Quality of a Stimulus.
    Loney GC; Eckel LA
    Chem Senses; 2021 Jan; 46():. PubMed ID: 34333585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preference test for sweet taste that uses edible strips.
    Smutzer G; Patel JY; Stull JC; Abarintos RA; Khan NK; Park KC
    Appetite; 2014 Feb; 73():132-9. PubMed ID: 24225255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumption of SC45647 and sucralose by rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake.
    Dess NK; Chapman CD; Monroe D
    Chem Senses; 2009 Mar; 34(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 19129238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Male rats show an indifference-avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Bello NT; Hajnal A
    Nutr Res; 2005 Jul; 25(7):693-699. PubMed ID: 16810335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No detriment in taste response or expression in offspring of mice fed representative levels of sucrose or non-caloric sucralose while pregnant.
    Choo E; Dando R
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 29108962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gastric bypass in female rats lowers concentrated sugar solution intake and preference without affecting brief-access licking after long-term sugar exposure.
    Hyde KM; Blonde GD; Bueter M; le Roux CW; Spector AC
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2020 May; 318(5):R870-R885. PubMed ID: 32083966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anandamide and sucralose change ΔFosB expression in the reward system.
    Salaya-Velazquez NF; López-Muciño LA; Mejía-Chávez S; Sánchez-Aparicio P; Domínguez-Guadarrama AA; Venebra-Muñoz A
    Neuroreport; 2020 Feb; 31(3):240-244. PubMed ID: 31923023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study of sucralose in Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Mann SW; Yuschak MM; Amyes SJ; Aughton P; Finn JP
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2000; 38 Suppl 2():S71-89. PubMed ID: 10882819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative affective potency of glycine, L-serine and sucrose as assessed by a brief-access taste test in inbred strains of mice.
    Dotson CD; Spector AC
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):489-98. PubMed ID: 15269121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Sweetened solution intake in albino rats: taste versus calories].
    Martínez Moreno AG; López-Espinoza A; de Jesús Díaz Reséndiz F; Valdés Miramontes E
    Psicothema; 2009 May; 21(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 19403070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 Mar; 40(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25560795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of the safety of sucralose.
    Grotz VL; Munro IC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19464334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sucralose can improve glucose tolerance and upregulate expression of sweet taste receptors and glucose transporters in an obese rat model.
    Qian C; Qi Y; Feng R; Yang M; Zhang M; Liu W; Rayner CK; Ma J
    Eur J Nutr; 2021 Jun; 60(4):1809-1817. PubMed ID: 32860125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.