261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21654041)
1. The performance of monotonic and new non-monotonic gradient ascent reconstruction algorithms for high-resolution neuroreceptor PET imaging.
Angelis GI; Reader AJ; Kotasidis FA; Lionheart WR; Matthews JC
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(13):3895-917. PubMed ID: 21654041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast 3D iterative image reconstruction for SPECT with rotating slat collimators.
Holen RV; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; De Beenhouwer J; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):715-29. PubMed ID: 19131666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accelerated time-of-flight (TOF) PET image reconstruction using TOF bin subsetization and TOF weighting matrix pre-computation.
Mehranian A; Kotasidis F; Zaidi H
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(3):1309-31. PubMed ID: 26796770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
Morimoto T; Ito H; Takano A; Ikoma Y; Seki C; Okauchi T; Tanimoto K; Ando A; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Suhara T
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16715957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acceleration of image-based resolution modelling reconstruction using an expectation maximization nested algorithm.
Angelis GI; Reader AJ; Markiewicz PJ; Kotasidis FA; Lionheart WR; Matthews JC
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Aug; 58(15):5061-83. PubMed ID: 23831633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An ordered-subsets proximal preconditioned gradient algorithm for edge-preserving PET image reconstruction.
Mehranian A; Rahmim A; Ay MR; Kotasidis F; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):052503. PubMed ID: 23635293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of ordered-subset reconstruction algorithms under conditions of extreme attenuation and truncation in myocardial SPECT.
Lalush DS; Tsui BM
J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):737-44. PubMed ID: 10768577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fully 3D iterative scatter-corrected OSEM for HRRT PET using a GPU.
Kim KS; Ye JC
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4991-5009. PubMed ID: 21772080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE+OSEM for PET.
Liu X; Comtat C; Michel C; Kinahan P; Defrise M; Townsend D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):804-14. PubMed ID: 11513031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.
van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19091902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A maximum likelihood expectation maximization algorithm with thresholding.
Chuang KS; Jan ML; Wu J; Lu JC; Chen S; Hsu CH; Fu YK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Oct; 29(7):571-8. PubMed ID: 15994060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incorporating HYPR de-noising within iterative PET reconstruction (HYPR-OSEM).
Cheng JK; Matthews J; Sossi V; Anton-Rodriguez J; Salomon A; Boellaard R
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6666-6687. PubMed ID: 28644152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Edge-preserving PET image reconstruction using trust optimization transfer.
Wang G; Qi J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Apr; 34(4):930-9. PubMed ID: 25438302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LOR-OSEM: statistical PET reconstruction from raw line-of-response histograms.
Kadrmas DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(20):4731-44. PubMed ID: 15566171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET.
Ahn S; Ross SG; Asma E; Miao J; Jin X; Cheng L; Wollenweber SD; Manjeshwar RM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(15):5733-51. PubMed ID: 26158503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography.
de Pierro AR; Beleza Yamagishi ME
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):280-8. PubMed ID: 11370895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studying the properties of the updating coefficients in the OSEM algorithm for iterative image reconstruction in PET.
Gaitanis A; Kontaxakis G; Spyrou G; Panayiotakis G; Tzanakos G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Sep; 99(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 20083322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A fast and stable maximum a posteriori conjugate gradient reconstruction algorithm.
Lalush DS; Tsui BM
Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1273-84. PubMed ID: 7476714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
