These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21654361)
1. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: rationale and organization. Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20802466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostics of radical prostatectomy specimens. Results of the 2009 consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology]. Kristiansen G; Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Pathologe; 2012 Jul; 33(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 22552640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease. Magi-Galluzzi C; Evans AJ; Delahunt B; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; van der Kwast TH; Montironi R; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Egevad LL; Humphrey PA; Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 20802467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 4: seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. Berney DM; Wheeler TM; Grignon DJ; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; Humphrey PA; van der Kwast T; Montironi R; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20818343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Handling of radical prostatectomy specimens: total or partial embedding? Vainer B; Toft BG; Olsen KE; Jacobsen GK; Marcussen N Histopathology; 2011 Jan; 58(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 21323948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume. van der Kwast TH; Amin MB; Billis A; Epstein JI; Griffiths D; Humphrey PA; Montironi R; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Egevad L; Delahunt B; Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 20818340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Epstein JI; Amin M; Boccon-Gibod L; Egevad L; Humphrey PA; Mikuz G; Newling D; Nilsson S; Sakr W; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Montironi R Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2005 May; (216):34-63. PubMed ID: 16019758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Samaratunga H; Montironi R; True L; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; Humphrey PA; van der Kwast T; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 20834234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. Srigley JR Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer. Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T; J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Fine SW; Amin MB; Berney DM; Bjartell A; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Humphrey PA; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Stief C Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):20-39. PubMed ID: 22421083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins. Tan PH; Cheng L; Srigley JR; Griffiths D; Humphrey PA; van der Kwast TH; Montironi R; Wheeler TM; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 20729812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens assessed by digital image analysis software correlates with other prognostic factors. Sherwin JC; Mirmilstein G; Pedersen J; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Mills J J Urol; 2010 May; 183(5):1808-14. PubMed ID: 20303103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]