276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21654513)
1. Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
J Glaucoma; 2012; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 21654513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-42. PubMed ID: 22789494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements.
Duba I; Wirthlin AC
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 May; 221(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 15162277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry.
Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Arruabarrena C; Teus MA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 256(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 29032414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment: a preliminary study in Thai patients.
Ruangvaravate N; Thuangtong A; Kosrirukvongs P; Prabhasawat P; Booranapong W; Srivannaboon S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Mar; 88(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 15962641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK.
Siganos DS; Papastergiou GI; Moedas C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 15093634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels.
Tamburrelli C; Giudiceandrea A; Vaiano AS; Caputo CG; Gullà F; Salgarello T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 46(9):3208-13. PubMed ID: 16123420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy.
Abbasoglu OE; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; McCulley JP
Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2193-6. PubMed ID: 9855146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between three- and six-month postoperative refractive and visual results after laser epithelial keratomileusis with mitomycin C.
de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Hernández-Verdejo JL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):71-76.e2. PubMed ID: 18774546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
