BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21656386)

  • 1. In vitro effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinses on polyspecies biofilms.
    Guggenheim B; Meier A
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2011; 121(5):432-41. PubMed ID: 21656386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro.
    Chen Y; Wong RW; Seneviratne CJ; Hägg U; McGrath C; Samaranayake LP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 21967942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of 0.2% Chlorhexidine, Listerine and Tulsi extract mouth rinses on salivary Streptococcus mutans count of high school children--RCT.
    Agarwal P; Nagesh L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov; 32(6):802-8. PubMed ID: 21763461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of chlorhexidine mouth rinse on Streptococci counts of tooth-tissue-borne palatal expander biofilm.
    Maruo IT; Rosa EA; Maruo H; Tanaka O; Guariza Filho O; Ignácio SA; Camargo ES
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Aug; 11(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 18713150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the efficacy of hyper-pure chlorine-dioxide with other oral antiseptics on oral pathogen microorganisms and biofilm in vitro.
    Herczegh A; Gyurkovics M; Agababyan H; Ghidán A; Lohinai Z
    Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 2013 Sep; 60(3):359-73. PubMed ID: 24060558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of three different formulations of mouth rinses with multi-herbal mouth rinse.
    Jain I; Jain P
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 27681394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different mouthrinses on morning breath.
    van Steenberghe D; Avontroodt P; Peeters W; Pauwels M; Coucke W; Lijnen A; Quirynen M
    J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1183-91. PubMed ID: 11577950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of different concentrations of chlorhexidine mouth rinses in reducing the mutans streptococci in saliva: an in vivo study.
    Jayaprakash R; Sharma A; Moses J
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 21157047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bactericidal effects of mouth rinses on oral bacteria.
    Kasuga Y; Ikenoya H; Okuda K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Nov; 38(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 9566143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fluorescence assay to determine the viable biomass of microcosm dental plaque biofilms.
    Filoche SK; Coleman MJ; Angker L; Sissons CH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Jun; 69(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 17408789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method to study sustained antimicrobial activity of rinse and dentifrice components on biofilm viability in vivo.
    van der Mei HC; White DJ; Atema-Smit J; van de Belt-Gritter E; Busscher HJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 16367850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
    Fine DH; Furgang D; Barnett ML
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):697-700. PubMed ID: 11422593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plaques from different individuals yield different microbiota responses to oral-antiseptic treatment.
    Filoche SK; Soma D; van Bekkum M; Sissons CH
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 54(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 18647353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biofilm reduction and staining potential of a 0.05% chlorhexidine rinse containing essential oils.
    Hofer D; Meier A; Sener B; Guggenheim B; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2011 Feb; 9(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 21226852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vivo comparison of antimicrobial activities of four commercial mouthwashes.
    Ciuffreda L; Boylan R; Scherer W; Palat M; Bacchi A
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(4):103-5. PubMed ID: 8602900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of chlorhexidine, listerine and fluoride listerine mouthrinses on four putative root-caries pathogens in the biofilm.
    Zheng CY; Wang ZH
    Chin J Dent Res; 2011; 14(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22319755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of antimicrobial mouth rinses in oral health care.
    Okuda K; Adachi M; Iijima K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Feb; 39(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9663026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
    Shapiro S; Giertsen E; Guggenheim B
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 12037365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in efficacy of two commercial 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinse solutions: a 4-day plaque re-growth study.
    Arweiler NB; Boehnke N; Sculean A; Hellwig E; Auschill TM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 May; 33(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 16634954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dietary staining in vitro by mouthrinses as a comparative measure of antiseptic activity and predictor of staining in vivo.
    Addy M; Mahdavi SA; Loyn T
    J Dent; 1995 Apr; 23(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7738271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.