150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21657125)
1. Restoration of maxillary anterior esthetics using lava all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Madan N; Pannu K
Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 21657125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a clinical review.
Bachhav VC; Aras MA
Quintessence Int; 2011 Feb; 42(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 21359252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture behaviour of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses in vitro.
Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Gilde H; Ruef T; Rammelsberg P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 18622828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture strength of prefabricated all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
Mehl C; Ludwig K; Steiner M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jan; 26(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 19836829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized zirconium-dioxide (Y-TZP) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with different abutment core thicknesses and connector dimensions.
Ambré MJ; Aschan F; Vult von Steyern P
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 23289522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results.
Peláez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Lozano JF; Suárez MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 22633593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inlay-retained zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: clinical and laboratory procedures.
Monaco C; Cardelli P; Bolognesi M; Scotti R; Ozcan M
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 22319764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Restoration of maxillary incisors with a zirconia all-ceramic system: a case report.
Polack MA
Quintessence Int; 2006 May; 37(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 16683685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inlay-retained zirconia fixed dental prostheses: modified designs for a completely adhesive approach.
Monaco C; Cardelli P; Ozcan M
J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b86. PubMed ID: 21736862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Mahmood DJ; Linderoth EH; Vult Von Steyern P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Jul; 69(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 21231816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with porcelain crowns reinforced with zirconia cores.
Albino LG; Gradinar O; Rodrigues JA
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e1-6. PubMed ID: 21613024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel ceria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia/alumina nanocomposite as framework material for posterior fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results of a prospective case series at 1 year of function.
Philipp A; Fischer J; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2010 Apr; 41(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 20305866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
Puschmann D; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 19583761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four-year clinical results of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures (Cercon): end abutments vs. cantilever design.
Wolfart S; Harder S; Eschbach S; Lehmann F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 117(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 20121939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
