These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21658661)

  • 1. Traditional response interference effects from anticipated action outcomes: a response-effect compatibility paradigm.
    Hubbard J; Gazzaley A; Morsella E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 21658661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Melcher T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 20875631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):943-74. PubMed ID: 20822210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimanual interference in rapid discrete movements is task specific and occurs at multiple levels of processing.
    Obhi SS; Goodale MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 94(3):1861-8. PubMed ID: 15917318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: an event-related fMRI analysis.
    Melcher T; Weidema M; Eenshuistra RM; Hommel B; Gruber O
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1274-88. PubMed ID: 17988896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex modulates response interference in a flanker task.
    Soto D; Montoro PR; Humphreys GW
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Feb; 451(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 19146925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?
    Hubbard EM; Ranzini M; Piazza M; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1200-16. PubMed ID: 19698941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representations in working memory yield interference effects found with externally-triggered representations.
    Hubbard J; Rigby T; Godwin CA; Gazzaley A; Morsella E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jan; 142(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 23277339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in course of action planning.
    Ziessler M; Nattkemper D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1305-26. PubMed ID: 21416456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions.
    Le Bars S; Hsu YF; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():6-15. PubMed ID: 27467892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm.
    Masaki H; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 10934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Paelecke M; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 17563226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensory-motor interference abolishes repetition priming for observed actions, but not for action-related verbs.
    Busiello M; Costantini M; Galati G; Committeri G
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 492(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 21281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements.
    Hay L; Redon C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17027153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel patterns of spatial compatibility and spatial congruence…as long as you don't look too closely.
    Mordkoff JT; Hazeltine E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 20800827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task.
    Morimoto HM; Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2006-14. PubMed ID: 18416674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.