134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21659322)
1. The standardize uptake value: light and shade of positron emission tomography.
Bertolaccini L; Rizzardi G; Terzi A; Bianchi A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 12(6):969. PubMed ID: 21659322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is there any maximum standardized uptake value variation among positron emission tomography scanners for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer?
Iskender I; Kadioglu SZ; Kosar A; Atasalihi A; Kir A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 12(6):965-9. PubMed ID: 21441257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sentinel node and positron emission tomography mapping in lung cancer.
Nwogu C
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009; 21(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 20226345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pattern and predictors of false positive lymph node involvement on positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Tamura M; Oda M; Matsumoto I; Waseda R; Watanabe G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 60(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 21789758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mediastinoscopy might not be necessary in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph nodes having a maximum standardized uptake value of less than 5.3.
Lee BE; Redwine J; Foster C; Abella E; Lown T; Lau D; Follette D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 18329480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The additional value of FDG PET imaging for distinguishing N0 or N1 from N2 stage in preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer in region where the prevalence of inflammatory lung disease is high.
Turkmen C; Sonmezoglu K; Toker A; Yilmazbayhan D; Dilege S; Halac M; Erelel M; Ece T; Mudun A
Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Aug; 32(8):607-12. PubMed ID: 17667432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is mediastinoscopy still the gold standard to evaluate mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma?
Sivrikoz CM; Ak I; Simsek FS; Döner E; Dündar E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 60(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 21692019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, a standard diagnostic tool in lung cancer.
Giaccone G
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Dec; 99(23):1741-3. PubMed ID: 18042929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The maximum standardized 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography predicts lymph node metastasis and invasiveness in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.
Maeda R; Isowa N; Onuma H; Miura H; Harada T; Touge H; Tokuyasu H; Kawasaki Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 9(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 19366724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lessons from the old masters: pragmatism or purity, FDG PET SUV, serum glucose and prediction of nodal status in non-small cell lung cancer.
Akhurst T
J Surg Oncol; 2006 Dec; 94(7):547-8. PubMed ID: 17111390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive value of primary fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose standard uptake value for a better choice of systematic nodal dissection or sampling in clinical stage ia non--small-cell lung cancer.
Li X; Zhang H; Xing L; Xu X; Xie P; Ma H; Zhang L; Chen M; Sun X; Xu W; Chen L; Yu J
Clin Lung Cancer; 2013 Sep; 14(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23835164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent progress in positron emission tomography concerning diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.
Nakamura H
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012; 18(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 22523107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of maximum standardized uptake value on fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in predicting lymph node involvement in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer.
Muto J; Hida Y; Kaga K; Ohtaka K; Okamoto S; Tamaki N; Nakada-Kubota R; Hirano S; Matsui Y
Anticancer Res; 2014 Feb; 34(2):805-10. PubMed ID: 24511016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph node in patients with suspected lung cancer after positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans.
Eloubeidi MA; Cerfolio RJ; Chen VK; Desmond R; Syed S; Ojha B
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 15620955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT interpretation of "mildly positive" mediastinal nodes in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer.
Moloney F; Ryan D; McCarthy L; McCarthy J; Burke L; Henry MT; Kennedy MP; Hinchion J; McSweeney S; Maher MM; O'Regan K
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):843-7. PubMed ID: 24581594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FDG-PET for lymph node staging in NSCLC: a major step forward, but beware of the pitfalls.
Vansteenkiste JF
Lung Cancer; 2005 Feb; 47(2):151-3. PubMed ID: 15639713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of primary tumor FDG uptake for occult mediastinal lymph node involvement in clinically N2/N3 node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.
Trister AD; Pryma DA; Xanthopoulos E; Kucharczuk J; Sterman D; Rengan R
Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Apr; 37(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 23111361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 18F-FDG PET for mediastinal staging of lung cancer: which SUV threshold makes sense?
Hellwig D; Graeter TP; Ukena D; Groeschel A; Sybrecht GW; Schaefers HJ; Kirsch CM
J Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 48(11):1761-6. PubMed ID: 17942814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radioguided detection of lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.
Nwogu C; Fischer G; Tan D; Glinianski M; Lamonica D; Demmy T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 82(5):1815-20; discussion 1820. PubMed ID: 17062254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-time-point FDG-PET for evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Nishiyama Y; Yamamoto Y; Kimura N; Ishikawa S; Sasakawa Y; Ohkawa M
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 May; 22(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 18535874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
