366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21659894)
1. A biomechanical analysis of straight and hexagonal barbell deadlifts using submaximal loads.
Swinton PA; Stewart A; Agouris I; Keogh JW; Lloyd R
J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2000-9. PubMed ID: 21659894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Examination of Muscle Activation and Power Characteristics While Performing the Deadlift Exercise With Straight and Hexagonal Barbells.
Camara KD; Coburn JW; Dunnick DD; Brown LE; Galpin AJ; Costa PB
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 May; 30(5):1183-8. PubMed ID: 26840440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of maximal velocity deadlifts performed with and without the inclusion of chain resistance.
Swinton PA; Stewart AD; Keogh JW; Agouris I; Lloyd R
J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Nov; 25(11):3163-74. PubMed ID: 21993040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Biomechanical Comparison of the Back Squat and Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift.
Stahl CA; Regni G; Tanguay J; McElfresh M; Trihy E; Diggin D; King DL
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):815-824. PubMed ID: 38662880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Bouncing the Barbell in the Conventional Deadlift.
Krajewski KT; LeFavi RG; Riemann BL
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S70-S77. PubMed ID: 29489730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinetics in lumbosacral and lower-limb joints of sprinters during barbell hip thrust compared to deadlift and back squat.
Otsuka M; Honjo T; Nagano A; Isaka T
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0251418. PubMed ID: 34197487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Muscle-Specific Effective Mechanical Advantage and Joint Impulse in Weightlifting.
Kipp K; Harris C
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1905-1910. PubMed ID: 27669187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of load positioning on the kinematics and kinetics of weighted vertical jumps.
Swinton PA; Stewart AD; Lloyd R; Agouris I; Keogh JW
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Apr; 26(4):906-13. PubMed ID: 22446664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Biomechanical Comparison Between the Safety-Squat Bar and Traditional Barbell Back Squat.
Johansson DG; Marchetti PH; Stecyk SD; Flanagan SP
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):825-834. PubMed ID: 38595263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Biomechanical Comparison Between a High and Low Barbell Placement on Net Joint Moments, Kinematics, Muscle Forces, and Muscle-Specific Moments in 3 Repetition Maximum Back Squats.
Larsen S; de Zee M; Kristiansen EL; van den Tillaar R
J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 38900172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinematic Differences Between the Front and Back Squat and Conventional and Sumo Deadlift.
Kasovic J; Martin B; Fahs CA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3213-3219. PubMed ID: 31567791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical comparison of the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat.
Swinton PA; Lloyd R; Keogh JW; Agouris I; Stewart AD
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26(7):1805-16. PubMed ID: 22505136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlations between internal and external power outputs during weightlifting exercise.
Kipp K; Harris C; Sabick MB
J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Apr; 27(4):1025-30. PubMed ID: 22739324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of a Hexagonal Barbell on the Mechanical Demand of Deadlift Performance.
Lake J; Duncan F; Jackson M; Naworynsky D
Sports (Basel); 2017 Oct; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 29910442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting.
Bryanton MA; Kennedy MD; Carey JP; Chiu LZ
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2820-8. PubMed ID: 22797000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weightlifting performance is related to kinematic and kinetic patterns of the hip and knee joints.
Kipp K; Redden J; Sabick MB; Harris C
J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Jul; 26(7):1838-44. PubMed ID: 21986692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts.
Escamilla RF; Francisco AC; Fleisig GS; Barrentine SW; Welch CM; Kayes AV; Speer KP; Andrews JR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Jul; 32(7):1265-75. PubMed ID: 10912892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical Demands of the Hang Power Clean and Jump Shrug: A Joint-Level Perspective.
Kipp K; Malloy PJ; Smith JC; Giordanelli MD; Kiely MT; Geiser CF; Suchomel TJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Feb; 32(2):466-474. PubMed ID: 27669182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Load-Power Relationship During a Countermovement Jump: A Joint Level Analysis.
Williams KJ; Chapman DW; Phillips EJ; Ball NB
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Apr; 32(4):955-961. PubMed ID: 29334580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing one repetition maximum and three repetition maximum between conventional and eccentrically loaded deadlifts.
Bishop A; DeBeliso M; Sevene TG; Adams KJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Jul; 28(7):1820-5. PubMed ID: 24276311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
