462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21659903)
61. Reliability and validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) in patients after total hip arthroplasty.
Wagenmakers R; van den Akker-Scheek I; Groothoff JW; Zijlstra W; Bulstra SK; Kootstra JW; Wendel-Vos GC; van Raaij JJ; Stevens M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Oct; 9():141. PubMed ID: 18928545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Active adults recall their physical activity differently to less active adults: test-retest reliability and validity of a physical activity survey.
Fjeldsoe BS; Winkler EA; Marshall AL; Eakin EG; Reeves MM
Health Promot J Austr; 2013 Apr; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23575586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Reliability and validity of the Flemish Physical Activity Computerized Questionnaire in adults.
Matton L; Wijndaele K; Duvigneaud N; Duquet W; Philippaerts R; Thomis M; Lefevre J
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2007 Sep; 78(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 17941534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Occupational sitting and work engagement among university employees.
Jones R; Credeur DP; McCoy SM
J Am Coll Health; 2023; 71(2):600-606. PubMed ID: 33760702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Criterion validity of the activPAL™ and ActiGraph for assessing children's sitting and standing time in a school classroom setting.
Ridley K; Ridgers ND; Salmon J
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Jul; 13():75. PubMed ID: 27387031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Convergent validity of six methods to assess physical activity in daily life.
Macfarlane DJ; Lee CC; Ho EY; Chan KL; Chan D
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1328-34. PubMed ID: 16825525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability.
Pedisic Z; Bennie JA; Timperio AF; Crawford DA; Dunstan DW; Bauman AE; Salmon J
BMC Public Health; 2014 Dec; 14():1249. PubMed ID: 25476788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Subjective and objective assessment of sedentary behavior among college employees.
Headley S; Hutchinson J; Wooley S; Dempsey K; Phan K; Spicer G; Janssen X; Laguilles J; Matthews T
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):768. PubMed ID: 29921244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire for seniors: validity and responsiveness.
Merom D; Delbaere K; Cumming R; Voukelatos A; Rissel C; Van Der Ploeg HP; Lord SR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 24743107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Sitting time and step counts in office workers.
Clemes SA; Patel R; Mahon C; Griffiths PL
Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Apr; 64(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 24477502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. What physical activity surveillance needs: validity of a single-item questionnaire.
Wanner M; Probst-Hensch N; Kriemler S; Meier F; Bauman A; Martin BW
Br J Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 48(21):1570-6. PubMed ID: 23770662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors in persons with multiple sclerosis and controls.
Sandroff BM; Motl RW
Disabil Rehabil; 2013 May; 35(9):725-31. PubMed ID: 23557239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Accelerometry is associated with walking mobility, not physical activity, in persons with multiple sclerosis.
Weikert M; Suh Y; Lane A; Sandroff B; Dlugonski D; Fernhall B; Motl RW
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jun; 34(5):590-7. PubMed ID: 21968005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Validity and reliability of the Arabic sedentary behavior questionnaire among university students aged between 18-30 years old.
Alahmadi MA; Almasoud KH; Aljahani AH; Alzaman NS; Nozha OMA; Alahmadi OM; Jalloun RA; Alfadhli EM; Alahmadi JM; Zuair AA; Alzahrani NS; Alahmdi AA; Alghamdi MA; Zoudji B; Aldayel AA; Al-Daghri NM
BMC Public Health; 2023 Jan; 23(1):128. PubMed ID: 36653773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Accuracy of recall of occupational physical activity by questionnaire.
Ainsworth BE; Richardson MT; Jacobs DR; Leon AS; Sternfeld B
J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Mar; 52(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10210239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Validity of a multi-context sitting questionnaire across demographically diverse population groups: AusDiab3.
Clark BK; Lynch BM; Winkler EA; Gardiner PA; Healy GN; Dunstan DW; Owen N
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():148. PubMed ID: 26637392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Criterion validity and test-retest reliability of SED-GIH, a single item question for assessment of daily sitting time.
Larsson K; Kallings LV; Ekblom Ö; Blom V; Andersson E; Ekblom MM
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 30611226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Does the use of standing 'hot' desks change sedentary work time in an open plan office?
Gilson ND; Suppini A; Ryde GC; Brown HE; Brown WJ
Prev Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 22056630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effects of filter choice in GT3X accelerometer assessments of free-living activity.
Wanner M; Martin BW; Meier F; Probst-Hensch N; Kriemler S
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jan; 45(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 22895373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. The Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities: test-retest reliability and comparison with an accelerometer.
van der Ploeg HP; Streppel KR; van der Beek AJ; van der Woude LH; Vollenbroek-Hutten M; van Mechelen W
J Phys Act Health; 2007 Jan; 4(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17489011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
