234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21660780)
1. Finite element and photoelastic modelling of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparative study.
Callanan A; Morris LG; McGloughlin TM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(10):1111-9. PubMed ID: 21660780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the photoelastic method and finite element analysis in the assessment of wall strain in abdominal aortic aneurysm models.
Doyle BJ; Killion J; Callanan A
J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(10):1759-68. PubMed ID: 22633540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis.
Merkx MA; van 't Veer M; Speelman L; Breeuwer M; Buth J; van de Vosse FN
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2369-73. PubMed ID: 19665127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: predicted rupture risk correlates with aortic wall histology in individual patients.
Erhart P; Grond-Ginsbach C; Hakimi M; Lasitschka F; Dihlmann S; Böckler D; Hyhlik-Dürr A
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Aug; 21(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 25101586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of regional mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms to advance finite element modeling of rupture risk.
Tierney ÁP; Callanan A; McGloughlin TM
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Feb; 19(1):100-14. PubMed ID: 22313210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction.
Scotti CM; Jimenez J; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Jun; 11(3):301-22. PubMed ID: 18568827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.
Bluestein D; Dumont K; De Beule M; Ricotta J; Impellizzeri P; Verhegghe B; Verdonck P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18651282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.
Maier A; Gee MW; Reeps C; Pongratz J; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 38(10):3124-34. PubMed ID: 20480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereoscopically observed deformations of a compliant abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
Meyer CA; Bertrand E; Boiron O; Deplano V
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Nov; 133(11):111004. PubMed ID: 22168736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of Rupture Sites in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms After Finite Element Analysis.
Erhart P; Roy J; de Vries JP; Liljeqvist ML; Grond-Ginsbach C; Hyhlik-Dürr A; Böckler D
J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Feb; 23(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 26496955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].
Giannoglou G; Giannakoulas G; Hatzitolios AI; Rudolf J
Herz; 2008 Jul; 33(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 18773155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quasi-static failure properties of the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall estimated by a mixed experimental-numerical approach.
Forsell C; Swedenborg J; Roy J; Gasser TC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1554-66. PubMed ID: 23263935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A numerical study of fluid-structure coupled effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Cong Y; Wang L; Liu X
Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S245-55. PubMed ID: 26406009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender, smoking, body size, and aneurysm geometry influence the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms as estimated by finite element analysis.
Lindquist Liljeqvist M; Hultgren R; Siika A; Gasser TC; Roy J
J Vasc Surg; 2017 Apr; 65(4):1014-1021.e4. PubMed ID: 28342508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.
Scotti CM; Shkolnik AD; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov; 4():64. PubMed ID: 16271141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel strategy to translate the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms to their equivalent diameter risk: method and retrospective validation.
Gasser TC; Nchimi A; Swedenborg J; Roy J; Sakalihasan N; Böckler D; Hyhlik-Dürr A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Mar; 47(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 24456739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors.
Erhart P; Hyhlik-Dürr A; Geisbüsch P; Kotelis D; Müller-Eschner M; Gasser TC; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Böckler D
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 25542592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models.
Leung JH; Wright AR; Cheshire N; Crane J; Thom SA; Hughes AD; Xu Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 May; 5():33. PubMed ID: 16712729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
