BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21660907)

  • 1. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
    Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
    Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices.
    Pungpapong S; Keaveny A; Raimondo M; Dickson R; Woodward T; Harnois D; Wallace M
    Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 17583856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a new technique for accurately detecting and grading esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
    Saeian K; Staff D; Knox J; Binion D; Townsend W; Dua K; Shaker R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Sep; 97(9):2246-9. PubMed ID: 12358240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
    Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
    Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capsule endoscopy is not as accurate as esophagogastroduodenoscopy in screening cirrhotic patients for varices.
    Chavalitdhamrong D; Jensen DM; Singh B; Kovacs TO; Han SH; Durazo F; Saab S; Gornbein JA
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):254-8.e1. PubMed ID: 22155754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esophageal capsule endoscopy vs. EGD for the evaluation of portal hypertension: a French prospective multicenter comparative study.
    Lapalus MG; Ben Soussan E; Gaudric M; Saurin JC; D'Halluin PN; Favre O; Filoche B; Cholet F; de Leusse A; Antonietti M; Gaudin JL; Sogni P; Heresbach D; Ponchon T; Dumortier J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 19337246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: a prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance.
    Lapalus MG; Dumortier J; Fumex F; Roman S; Lot M; Prost B; Mion F; Ponchon T
    Endoscopy; 2006 Jan; 38(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 16429353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
    Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study.
    Eisen GM; Eliakim R; Zaman A; Schwartz J; Faigel D; Rondonotti E; Villa F; Weizman E; Yassin K; deFranchis R
    Endoscopy; 2006 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16429352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
    Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of operator experience and reporting time on the accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy screening for varices.
    Wigg AJ; Bull J; de Silva M; Jusaitis M; Ramachandran J; Edwards S; Rodgers A; Bampton P; Martin J; Woodman RJ
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2011; 34(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 21814064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening of esophageal varices by esophageal capsule endoscopy: results of a French multicenter prospective study.
    Sacher-Huvelin S; Calès P; Bureau C; Valla D; Vinel JP; Duburque C; Attar A; Archambeaud I; Benamouzig R; Gaudric M; Luet D; Couzigou P; Planche L; Galmiche JP; Coron E
    Endoscopy; 2015 Jun; 47(6):486-92. PubMed ID: 25730284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexible imaging color enhancement improves visibility of transnasal endoscopic images in diagnosing esophageal varices: a multicenter prospective blinded study.
    Furuichi Y; Kawai T; Ichimura S; Metoki R; Miyata Y; Oshima T; Sano T; Murashima E; Taira J; Sugimoto K; Kamamoto H; Imai Y; Moriyasu F
    J Dig Dis; 2012 Dec; 13(12):634-41. PubMed ID: 23134117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study.
    Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
    Dig Endosc; 2009 Jan; 21(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19691797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study comparing oesophageal capsule endoscopy versus EGD in the detection of varices.
    Pena LR; Cox T; Koch AG; Bosch A
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Mar; 40(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 18082473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
    Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unsedated esophagoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.
    Darwin P; Zangara J; Heller T; Haluszka O; Laurin J
    Endoscopy; 2000 Dec; 32(12):971-3. PubMed ID: 11147947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
    Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.