These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21661548)

  • 1. Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures.
    Rayfield B; Fortin MJ; Fall A
    Ecology; 2011 Apr; 92(4):847-58. PubMed ID: 21661548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning.
    Minor ES; Urban DL
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18241238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graph and circuit theory connectivity models of conservation biological control agents.
    Koh I; Rowe HI; Holland JD
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Oct; 23(7):1554-73. PubMed ID: 24261040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prioritizing Urban Habitats for Connectivity Conservation: Integrating Centrality and Ecological Metrics.
    Poodat F; Arrowsmith C; Fraser D; Gordon A
    Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 56(3):664-74. PubMed ID: 25924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graph models of habitat mosaics.
    Urban DL; Minor ES; Treml EA; Schick RS
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Mar; 12(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 19161432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Network connectivity value.
    Dragicevic A; Boulanger V; Bruciamacchie M; Chauchard S; Dupouey JL; Stenger A
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():310-322. PubMed ID: 28237395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amphibian habitat network planning based on the graph theory: A case study of
    Zhang L; He L; Yan F; Chen YH
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Mar; 32(3):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 33754572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change.
    Albert CH; Rayfield B; Dumitru M; Gonzalez A
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1383-1396. PubMed ID: 28383758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning.
    Minor ES; Urban DL
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Sep; 17(6):1771-82. PubMed ID: 17913139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America.
    Carroll C; McRae BH; Brookes A
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 22010832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming.
    Álvarez-Romero JG; Munguía-Vega A; Beger M; Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros M; Suárez-Castillo AN; Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Gerber LR; Morzaria-Luna HN; Reyes-Bonilla H; Adams VM; Kolb M; Graham EM; VanDerWal J; Castillo-López A; Hinojosa-Arango G; Petatán-Ramírez D; Moreno-Baez M; Godínez-Reyes CR; Torre J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):e671-e691. PubMed ID: 29274104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation.
    McRae BH; Dickson BG; Keitt TH; Shah VB
    Ecology; 2008 Oct; 89(10):2712-24. PubMed ID: 18959309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representing connectivity: quantifying effective habitat availability based on area and connectivity for conservation status assessment and recovery.
    Neel M; Tumas HR; Marsden BW
    PeerJ; 2014; 2():e622. PubMed ID: 25320685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of planning for connectivity on linear reserve networks.
    Lentini PE; Gibbons P; Carwardine J; Fischer J; Drielsma M; Martin TG
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):796-807. PubMed ID: 23647073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Representation, analysis and application of landscape graph based on graph theory].
    Song LL; Qin MZ; Zhang PY; Xia YF; Ma J; Cao W
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Oct; 31(10):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 33314849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wild, connected, and diverse: building a more resilient system of protected areas.
    Belote RT; Dietz MS; Jenkins CN; McKinley PS; Irwin GH; Fullman TJ; Leppi JC; Aplet GH
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1050-1056. PubMed ID: 28263450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix.
    Jacobi MN; Jonsson PR
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jul; 21(5):1861-70. PubMed ID: 21830724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating priority areas and ecological corridors into national network for conservation planning in China.
    Liang J; He X; Zeng G; Zhong M; Gao X; Li X; Li X; Wu H; Feng C; Xing W; Fang Y; Mo D
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():22-29. PubMed ID: 29331835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity.
    Estrada E; Bodin O
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Oct; 18(7):1810-25. PubMed ID: 18839774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corridors best facilitate functional connectivity across a protected area network.
    Stewart FEC; Darlington S; Volpe JP; McAdie M; Fisher JT
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10852. PubMed ID: 31350429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.