179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21664959)
1. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Hu N; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
Botros A; Psarros C
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Stille LJ
Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
Cohen LT
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial overlap of combined electroacoustic stimulation determines the electrically evoked response in the guinea pig cochlea.
Stronks HC; Prijs VF; Chimona TS; Grolman W; Klis SF
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1535-42. PubMed ID: 23099336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons.
Konerding W; Arenberg JG; Kral A; Baumhoff P
Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 413():108057. PubMed ID: 32883545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
