These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21665642)

  • 1. A comparison of two methods of calculating GST, a genetic measure of population differentiation.
    Culley TM; Wallace LE; Gengler-Nowak KM; Crawford DJ
    Am J Bot; 2002 Mar; 89(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 21665642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is genetic differentiation, and how should we measure it--GST, D, neither or both?
    Verity R; Nichols RA
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Sep; 23(17):4216-25. PubMed ID: 25039308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics!
    Gerlach G; Jueterbock A; Kraemer P; Deppermann J; Harmand P
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(18):3845-52. PubMed ID: 20735737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring population differentiation using GST or D? A simulation study with microsatellite DNA markers under a finite island model and nonequilibrium conditions.
    Leng L; Zhang DE
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jun; 20(12):2494-509. PubMed ID: 21557781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comprehensive Study of Genic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Estimates of Heterozygosity and Patterns of Geographic Differentiation.
    Singh RS; Rhomberg LR
    Genetics; 1987 Oct; 117(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 17246403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does GST underestimate genetic differentiation from marker data?
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jul; 24(14):3546-58. PubMed ID: 25891752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nei's to Bayes': comparing computational methods and genetic markers to estimate patterns of genetic variation in Tolpis (Asteraceae).
    Levsen ND; Crawford DJ; Archibald JK; Santos-Geurra A; Mort ME
    Am J Bot; 2008 Nov; 95(11):1466-74. PubMed ID: 21628154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multivariate QST-FST comparisons: a neutrality test for the evolution of the g matrix in structured populations.
    Martin G; Chapuis E; Goudet J
    Genetics; 2008 Dec; 180(4):2135-49. PubMed ID: 18245845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons between Q(ST) and F(ST) --how wrong have we been?
    Edelaar P; Burraco P; Gomez-Mestre I
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Dec; 20(23):4830-9. PubMed ID: 22060729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Alcala N; Rosenberg NA
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Apr; 28(7):1624-1636. PubMed ID: 30589985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation.
    Hardy OJ; Charbonnel N; Fréville H; Heuertz M
    Genetics; 2003 Apr; 163(4):1467-82. PubMed ID: 12702690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. If F(ST) does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with Q(ST) is misleading. Or is it?
    Edelaar P; Björklund M
    Mol Ecol; 2011 May; 20(9):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21410574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the unbiased estimator theta for population genetic survey data.
    Weicker JJ; Brumfield RT; Winker K
    Evolution; 2001 Dec; 55(12):2601-5. PubMed ID: 11831672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of genetical differentiation among subpopulations.
    Gregorius HR; Roberds JH
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Mar; 71(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 24247710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis.
    Leinonen T; O'Hara RB; Cano JM; Merilä J
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 18028355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the measurements of genetic differentiation among populations.
    Wang J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Oct; 94(5):275-89. PubMed ID: 23298450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Genetic diversity of natural and planted Glyptostrobus pensilis populations: a comparative study].
    Wu ZY; Liu JF; Hong W; Pan DM; Zheng SQ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2011 Apr; 22(4):873-9. PubMed ID: 21774306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analyses of population genetic structure by using dominant markers].
    Qian W; Ge S
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2001; 28(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 11280998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of differentiation in a colour polymorphism and in neutral markers reveal rapid genetic changes in natural damselfly populations.
    Abbott JK; Bensch S; Gosden TP; Svensson EI
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Mar; 17(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 18284565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.