BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21665999)

  • 1. Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato.
    El Oirdi M; El Rahman TA; Rigano L; El Hadrami A; Rodriguez MC; Daayf F; Vojnov A; Bouarab K
    Plant Cell; 2011 Jun; 23(6):2405-21. PubMed ID: 21665999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Necrotrophic pathogens use the salicylic acid signaling pathway to promote disease development in tomato.
    Rahman TA; Oirdi ME; Gonzalez-Lamothe R; Bouarab K
    Mol Plant Microbe Interact; 2012 Dec; 25(12):1584-93. PubMed ID: 22950753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of dioxygenase α-DOX2 and SA in basal response and in hexanoic acid-induced resistance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants against Botrytis cinerea.
    Angulo C; de la O Leyva M; Finiti I; López-Cruz J; Fernández-Crespo E; García-Agustín P; González-Bosch C
    J Plant Physiol; 2015 Mar; 175():163-73. PubMed ID: 25543862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antagonism between phytohormone signalling underlies the variation in disease susceptibility of tomato plants under elevated CO2.
    Zhang S; Li X; Sun Z; Shao S; Hu L; Ye M; Zhou Y; Xia X; Yu J; Shi K
    J Exp Bot; 2015 Apr; 66(7):1951-63. PubMed ID: 25657213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priming for JA-dependent defenses using hexanoic acid is an effective mechanism to protect Arabidopsis against B. cinerea.
    Kravchuk Z; Vicedo B; Flors V; Camañes G; González-Bosch C; García-Agustín P
    J Plant Physiol; 2011 Mar; 168(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 20950893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive analysis of multiprotein bridging factor 1 family genes and SlMBF1c negatively regulate the resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato.
    Zhang X; Xu Z; Chen L; Ren Z
    BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):437. PubMed ID: 31638895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tomato histone H2B monoubiquitination enzymes SlHUB1 and SlHUB2 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea through modulating the balance between SA- and JA/ET-mediated signaling pathways.
    Zhang Y; Li D; Zhang H; Hong Y; Huang L; Liu S; Li X; Ouyang Z; Song F
    BMC Plant Biol; 2015 Oct; 15():252. PubMed ID: 26490733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of systemic resistance in tomato against Botrytis cinerea by N-decanoyl-homoserine lactone via jasmonic acid signaling.
    Hu Z; Shao S; Zheng C; Sun Z; Shi J; Yu J; Qi Z; Shi K
    Planta; 2018 May; 247(5):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 29445868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knockout of SlMAPK3 Reduced Disease Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Tomato Plants.
    Zhang S; Wang L; Zhao R; Yu W; Li R; Li Y; Sheng J; Shen L
    J Agric Food Chem; 2018 Aug; 66(34):8949-8956. PubMed ID: 30092129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systemic resistance to gray mold induced in tomato by benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum T39.
    Harel YM; Mehari ZH; Rav-David D; Elad Y
    Phytopathology; 2014 Feb; 104(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 24047252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The epiphytic fungus Pseudozyma aphidis induces jasmonic acid- and salicylic acid/nonexpressor of PR1-independent local and systemic resistance.
    Buxdorf K; Rahat I; Gafni A; Levy M
    Plant Physiol; 2013 Apr; 161(4):2014-22. PubMed ID: 23388119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Silencing of the tomato phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C2 (SlPLC2) reduces plant susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea.
    Gonorazky G; Guzzo MC; Abd-El-Haliem AM; Joosten MH; Laxalt AM
    Mol Plant Pathol; 2016 Dec; 17(9):1354-1363. PubMed ID: 26868615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abscisic acid determines basal susceptibility of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and suppresses salicylic acid-dependent signaling mechanisms.
    Audenaert K; De Meyer GB; Höfte MM
    Plant Physiol; 2002 Feb; 128(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 11842153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhamnolipids elicit defense responses and induce disease resistance against biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic pathogens that require different signaling pathways in Arabidopsis and highlight a central role for salicylic acid.
    Sanchez L; Courteaux B; Hubert J; Kauffmann S; Renault JH; Clément C; Baillieul F; Dorey S
    Plant Physiol; 2012 Nov; 160(3):1630-41. PubMed ID: 22968829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato.
    Liu M; Zhang Z; Xu Z; Wang L; Chen C; Ren Z
    Plant Cell Rep; 2021 Jan; 40(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 32990799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERF5 and ERF6 play redundant roles as positive regulators of JA/Et-mediated defense against Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis.
    Moffat CS; Ingle RA; Wathugala DL; Saunders NJ; Knight H; Knight MR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35995. PubMed ID: 22563431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AtOZF1 positively regulates JA signaling and SA-JA cross-talk in
    Singh N; Nandi AK
    J Biosci; 2022; 47():. PubMed ID: 35092410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SA-dependent defense pathway is active against different pathogens in tomato and tobacco.
    Achuo AE; Audenaert K; Meziane H; Höfte M
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2002; 67(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 12701417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The tomato Mediator subunit MED8 positively regulates plant response to Botrytis cinerea.
    Zhang L; Song Y; Liu K; Gong F
    J Plant Physiol; 2021 Nov; 266():153533. PubMed ID: 34601339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plastidial fatty acid signaling modulates salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid-mediated defense pathways in the Arabidopsis ssi2 mutant.
    Kachroo A; Lapchyk L; Fukushige H; Hildebrand D; Klessig D; Kachroo P
    Plant Cell; 2003 Dec; 15(12):2952-65. PubMed ID: 14615603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.