These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21667175)

  • 1. The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S-R associations or inhibition of executive control processes?
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 21667175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency and interactions of alerting, orienting and executive networks: the impact of imperative stimulus type.
    Spagna A; Martella D; Sebastiani M; Maccari L; Marotta A; Casagrande M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():209-15. PubMed ID: 24607440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effects of phasic and tonic alerting on the efficiency of executive attention.
    Asanowicz D; Marzecová A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 May; 176():58-70. PubMed ID: 28376344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of chronotype in the interaction between the alerting and the executive control networks.
    Martínez-Pérez V; Palmero LB; Campoy G; Fuentes LJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11901. PubMed ID: 32681046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alertness can be improved by an interaction between orienting attention and alerting attention in schizophrenia.
    Amado I; Lupiañez J; Chirio M; Landgraf S; Willard D; Olié JP; Krebs MO
    Behav Brain Funct; 2011 Jul; 7():24. PubMed ID: 21729299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do alerting signals increase the size of the attentional focus?
    Seibold VC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):402-425. PubMed ID: 29168126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alertness and cognitive control: Testing the early onset hypothesis.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):756-766. PubMed ID: 29154631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parsing the intrinsic networks underlying attention: a resting state study.
    Visintin E; De Panfilis C; Antonucci C; Capecci C; Marchesi C; Sambataro F
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():315-22. PubMed ID: 25311282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of alerting signals in masked priming.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kiesel A
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():448. PubMed ID: 23882248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acute psychological stress promotes general alertness and attentional control processes: An ERP study.
    Qi M; Gao H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13521. PubMed ID: 31898811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive control of attention in individuals with contamination-related obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
    Najmi S; Hindash AC; Amir N
    Depress Anxiety; 2010 Sep; 27(9):807-12. PubMed ID: 20821800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of alerting signals on the spatial Stroop effect: evidence for modality differences.
    Kahan TA; Smith ZP
    Psychol Res; 2024 Feb; 88(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 37389672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phasic alertness can modulate executive control by enhancing global processing of visual stimuli.
    Weinbach N; Henik A
    Cognition; 2011 Dec; 121(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 21925653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A child-focused version of the Attention Network Task designed to investigate interactions between the attention networks, including the endogenous orienting network.
    Johnson KA; Lewis FC; Cornish KM
    Child Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 26(5):666-690. PubMed ID: 31833444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reward associations on components of attentional network.
    Cao H; Zhang S; Yang X; Ding X; Ren Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103212. PubMed ID: 33197641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
    Paap KR; Anders-Jefferson R; Zimiga B; Mason L; Mikulinsky R
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Feb; 5(1):7. PubMed ID: 32056032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):577-601. PubMed ID: 16104096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of fear on attentional processing in a sample of healthy females.
    Finucane AM; Power MJ
    J Anxiety Disord; 2010 Jan; 24(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19729280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task?
    Burle B; Spieser L; Servant M; Hasbroucq T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1003-10. PubMed ID: 24302468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Bossert ML; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1808-1823. PubMed ID: 27357224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.