54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21667735)
1. Single level cervical arthroplasty with the Discocerv prosthesis: a preliminary report.
Enan A; Abu-Hegazy M; Abo-Hegy M; Al-Kerdany A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Apr; 77(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 21667735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.
Kang KC; Lee CS; Han JH; Chung SS
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):689-96. PubMed ID: 20547108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.
Kim SW; Shin JH; Arbatin JJ; Park MS; Chung YK; McAfee PC
Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement].
Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; Han X
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 18785527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty.
Fong SY; DuPlessis SJ; Casha S; Hurlbert RJ
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16651216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Peng CW; Quirno M; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):551-5. PubMed ID: 19447077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preliminary clinical outcome of three-level artificial disc replacement with PRESTIGE LP for cervical disc degenerative disease].
Liu H; Shi R; Liu X; Zhao X; Li T; Gong Q; Zeng J; Song Y; Hong Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 23(12):1413-7. PubMed ID: 20073299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis--does it occur?
Sears WR; Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Williamson OD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17285044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical report of cervical arthroplasty in management of spondylotic myelopathy].
Wang Y; Xiao SH; Lu N; Zhang XS
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 42(21):1333-7. PubMed ID: 15634438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early follow-up outcomes after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the discover cervical disc prosthesis.
Du J; Li M; Liu H; Meng H; He Q; Luo Z
Spine J; 2011 Apr; 11(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 21377939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study].
Wang Y; Cai B; Zhang XS; Xiao SH; Wang Z; Lu N; Chai W; Zheng GQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 18785525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical segmental motion at levels adjacent to disc herniation as determined with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging.
Daffner SD; Xin J; Taghavi CE; Hymanson HJ; Mudiyam C; Hongyu W; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2389-94. PubMed ID: 19829252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.
Rabin D; Bertagnoli R; Wharton N; Pickett GE; Duggal N
Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18619913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The mid-term effects of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis on sagittal alignment of overall cervical spine and the functional spinal unit].
Jiang Y; Tian Y; Wang YP; Qiu GX; Weng XS; Feng B
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 50(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 22800749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
