These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21667750)

  • 1. Changes in background impair fluency-triggered positive affect: a cross-cultural test using a mere-exposure paradigm.
    Ishii K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Apr; 112(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 21667750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating the mere exposure effect through changes in context between exposure and test.
    de Zilva D; Mitchell CJ; Newell BR
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(8):1345-58. PubMed ID: 23506223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The mere exposure effect for stimuli presented below recognition threshold: a failure to replicate.
    Fox SE; Burns DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 8483644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiarity does not affect the unilateral field advantage for repetition detection.
    Butcher SJ; Cavanagh P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1216-25. PubMed ID: 22532384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect.
    Yagi Y; Ikoma S; Kikuchi T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1403-10. PubMed ID: 19857012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple context mere exposure: Examining the limits of liking.
    de Zilva D; Newell BR; Mitchell CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):521-34. PubMed ID: 26120936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency-preference links.
    Willems S; Van der Linden M
    Conscious Cogn; 2006 Jun; 15(2):323-41. PubMed ID: 16182567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motormouth: mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):423-33. PubMed ID: 19271856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceiving "outside the box" occurs early in development: evidence for boundary extension in three- to seven-month-old infants.
    Quinn PC; Intraub H
    Child Dev; 2007; 78(1):324-34. PubMed ID: 17328708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of recognizability on figure-ground processing: does it affect parsing or only figure selection?
    Navon D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):608-24. PubMed ID: 21069619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents.
    Uttal DH; Gentner D; Liu LL; Lewis AR
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):156-70. PubMed ID: 18171376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference.
    Zellner DA; Mattingly MC; Parker S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1228-32. PubMed ID: 19633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual recognition: as soon as you know it is there, you know what it is.
    Grill-Spector K; Kanwisher N
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15686582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect object recognition: evidence for associative processes in recognition memory.
    Whitt E; Haselgrove M; Robinson J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 22103695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of gist in scene recognition.
    Sampanes AC; Tseng P; Bridgeman B
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2275-83. PubMed ID: 18692519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Picture book exposure elicits positive visual preferences in toddlers.
    Houston-Price C; Burton E; Hickinson R; Inett J; Moore E; Salmon K; Shiba P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Sep; 104(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 19427645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implicit preferences: the role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect.
    Zizak DM; Reber AS
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Jun; 13(2):336-62. PubMed ID: 15134764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal limitation of Navon effect on face recognition.
    Hills PJ; Lewis MB
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Apr; 104(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 17566440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of mere exposure on category evaluation measured by the IAT and the GNAT].
    Kawakami N; Sato H; Yoshida F
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2010 Dec; 81(5):437-45. PubMed ID: 21226281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.