These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21668104)

  • 1. Judging approachability on the face of it: the influence of face and body expressions on the perception of approachability.
    Willis ML; Palermo R; Burke D
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):514-523. PubMed ID: 21668104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Happy but not so approachable: the social judgments of individuals with generalized social phobia.
    Campbell DW; Sareen J; Stein MB; Kravetsky LB; Paulus MP; Hassard ST; Reiss JP
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 19242987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Situational Context and Perceived Threat Modulate Approachability Judgements to Emotional Faces.
    Willis ML; Windsor NA; Lawson DL; Ridley NJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131472. PubMed ID: 26121528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotional facial expressions differentially influence predictions and performance for face recognition.
    Nomi JS; Rhodes MG; Cleary AM
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 22712473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face-to-face: Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing.
    Bublatzky F; Pittig A; Schupp HT; Alpers GW
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 May; 12(5):811-822. PubMed ID: 28158672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of face approachability: correlations with trait anxiety.
    Toki S; Okamoto Y; Onoda K; Kinoshita A; Shishida K; Machino A; Fukumoto T; Yamashita H; Yoshida H; Yamawaki S
    Neuropsychobiology; 2013; 68(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 24051621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judging trustworthiness from faces: Emotion cues modulate trustworthiness judgments in young children.
    Caulfield F; Ewing L; Bank S; Rhodes G
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 107(3):503-18. PubMed ID: 26493772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of emotional empathy to approachability judgments assigned to emotional faces is context specific.
    Willis ML; Lawson DL; Ridley NJ; Koval P; Rendell PG
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1209. PubMed ID: 26347680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixed matters: fluency impacts trust ratings when faces range on valence but not on motivational implications.
    Olszanowski M; Kaminska OK; Winkielman P
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1032-1051. PubMed ID: 29057707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search.
    Savage RA; Lipp OV; Craig BM; Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Emotion; 2013 Aug; 13(4):758-68. PubMed ID: 23527503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.
    Hagemann J; Straube T; Schulz C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():136-49. PubMed ID: 26878979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faces in-between: evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency.
    Winkielman P; Olszanowski M; Gola M
    Emotion; 2015 Apr; 15(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 25642724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The confounded nature of angry men and happy women.
    Becker DV; Kenrick DT; Neuberg SL; Blackwell KC; Smith DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Feb; 92(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 17279844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does mimicry affect evaluative judgment?
    Foroni F; Semin GR
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 21668115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of alcohol on ratings of emotional facial expressions in social phobics.
    Stevens S; Gerlach AL; Rist F
    J Anxiety Disord; 2008 Aug; 22(6):940-8. PubMed ID: 17976952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The influence of positive or negative information from facial expressions on preference judgment: Examination of quantity and ratio].
    Nunoi M; Yoshikawa S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2016 Oct; 87(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 29620328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judgment of other people's facial expressions of emotions is influenced by their concurrent affective hand movements.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 18384495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Looking at the face and seeing the whole body. Neural basis of combined face and body expressions.
    Poyo Solanas M; Zhan M; Vaessen M; Hortensius R; Engelen T; de Gelder B
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 13(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 29092076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.
    Pinkham AE; Griffin M; Baron R; Sasson NJ; Gur RC
    Emotion; 2010 Feb; 10(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 20141311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociation between recognition and detection advantage for facial expressions: a meta-analysis.
    Nummenmaa L; Calvo MG
    Emotion; 2015 Apr; 15(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 25706834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.