These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21668830)

  • 1. Novel approach for designing a low weight hip implant used in total hip arthroplasty adopting skeletal design techniques.
    Sivarasu S; Beulah P; Mathew L
    Artif Organs; 2011 Jun; 35(6):663-6. PubMed ID: 21668830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design optimization of skeletal hip implant cross-sections using finite-element analysis.
    Beulah P; Sivarasu S; Mathew L
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2009; 19(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 21083533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
    Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant wear mechanisms--basic approach.
    Bhatt H; Goswami T
    Biomed Mater; 2008 Dec; 3(4):042001. PubMed ID: 18824778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
    Behairy YM; Harris WH
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Grigoris P; Roberts P; Panousis K; Bosch H
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):125-34, vii. PubMed ID: 15833450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty.
    Engh CA; Young AM; Engh CA; Hopper RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):157-63. PubMed ID: 14646713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.
    Sakai R; Kanai N; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 16431001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Gong X; Kang L; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symposium on Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Hip. Biomechanics: mutifactorial design choices--an essential compromise?
    Clarke IC
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1982 Oct; 13(4):681-707. PubMed ID: 7145341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.