These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21669210)

  • 1. Model parameter uncertainties in a dual-species biofilm competition model affect ecological output parameters much stronger than morphological ones.
    Muhammad N; Eberl HJ
    Math Biosci; 2011 Sep; 233(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 21669210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction-diffusion model of nutrient uptake in a biofilm: theory and experiment.
    Petroff AP; Wu TD; Liang B; Mui J; Guerquin-Kern JL; Vali H; Rothman DH; Bosak T
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Nov; 289():90-5. PubMed ID: 21840322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An exclusion principle and the importance of mobility for a class of biofilm models.
    Klapper I; Szomolay B
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Sep; 73(9):2213-30. PubMed ID: 21240563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty in bulk-liquid hydrodynamics and biofilm dynamics creates uncertainties in biofilm reactor design.
    Boltz JP; Daigger GT
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 20107256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistence in a single species CSTR model with suspended flocs and wall attached biofilms.
    Mašić A; Eberl HJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2012 Apr; 74(4):1001-26. PubMed ID: 22131185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Mixed-Culture Biofilm Model with Cross-Diffusion.
    Rahman KA; Sudarsan R; Eberl HJ
    Bull Math Biol; 2015 Nov; 77(11):2086-124. PubMed ID: 26582360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms.
    Battin TJ; Kaplan LA; Denis Newbold J; Hansen CM
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6965):439-42. PubMed ID: 14647381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biofilm formation at warming temperature: acceleration of microbial colonization and microbial interactive effects.
    Diaz Villanueva V; Font J; Schwartz T; Romani AM
    Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 21113861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiology and behavior of Pseudomonas fluorescens single and dual strain biofilms under diverse hydrodynamics stresses.
    Simões M; Simões LC; Vieira MJ
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 128(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 18951643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow.
    Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC; Heijnen JJ
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2001 Jan; 72(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 11114658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review.
    Monds RD; O'Toole GA
    Trends Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 17(2):73-87. PubMed ID: 19162483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of biofilm permeability on bio-clogging of porous media.
    Pintelon TR; Picioreanu C; Loosdrecht MC; Johns ML
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2012 Apr; 109(4):1031-42. PubMed ID: 22095039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the development of biofilm density including active bacteria, inert biomass, and extracellular polymeric substances.
    Laspidou CS; Rittmann BE
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3349-61. PubMed ID: 15276752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biofilm model calibration and microbial diversity study using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Brockmann D; Caylet A; Escudié R; Steyer JP; Bernet N
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 May; 110(5):1323-32. PubMed ID: 23280411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anisotropic nutrient transport in three-dimensional single species bacterial biofilms.
    Van Wey AS; Cookson AL; Soboleva TK; Roy NC; McNabb WC; Bridier A; Briandet R; Shorten PR
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2012 May; 109(5):1280-92. PubMed ID: 22124974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating trends in biofilm density using the UMCCA model.
    Laspidou CS; Rittmann BE
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3362-72. PubMed ID: 15276753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AMD biofilms: using model communities to study microbial evolution and ecological complexity in nature.
    Denef VJ; Mueller RS; Banfield JF
    ISME J; 2010 May; 4(5):599-610. PubMed ID: 20164865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A framework for multidimensional modelling of activity and structure of multispecies biofilms.
    Xavier JB; Picioreanu C; van Loosdrecht MC
    Environ Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 7(8):1085-103. PubMed ID: 16011747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biofilm development in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor: effect of flow velocity on performance.
    Casey E; Glennon B; Hamer G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2000 Feb; 67(4):476-86. PubMed ID: 10620763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling how soluble microbial products (SMP) support heterotrophic bacteria in autotroph-based biofilms.
    Merkey BV; Rittmann BE; Chopp DL
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(4):670-83. PubMed ID: 19481097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.