These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21669386)
1. Perspectives on "early dialogue" between a manufacturer and health technology assessment agencies. Geisler BP Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):607. PubMed ID: 21669386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Early dialogue between the developers of new technologies and pricing and reimbursement agencies: a pilot study. Backhouse ME; Wonder M; Hornby E; Kilburg A; Drummond M; Mayer FK Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):608-15. PubMed ID: 21669387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health technology assessment (HTA) increasingly important in spine research. van Tulder M Eur Spine J; 2011 Jul; 20(7):999-1000. PubMed ID: 21720729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biosimilars: evidential standards for health technology assessment. Hughes DA Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Mar; 87(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 20160743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The need for Health Technology Assessments of PET. Van Tinteren H; Hoekstra OS; Boers M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Oct; 30(10):1438-9; author reply 1439. PubMed ID: 12898206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health technology assessment of PET in oncology: re Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:637-641. Kristensen FB; Adams E; Briones E; Coburn D; Facey K; Hansen NW; Hoeksema J; Mørland B Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Feb; 31(2):295-7; author reply 297-8; discussion 298. PubMed ID: 15129712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health technology assessment in Europe. Kristensen FB Scand J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 37(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 19493989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Are health technology assessments a reliable tool in th analysis of the clinical value of PET in oncology? Who audits the auditors? Højgaard L Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May; 30(5):637-41. PubMed ID: 12838956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health technology assessment. Hailey D Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Written in the stars. Introducing our five-star rating system. Health Devices; 2010 Mar; 39(3):73. PubMed ID: 21309267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy. Migliore A; Ratti M; Cerbo M; Jefferson T Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 May; 6(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19419283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NICE Health Technology Appraisal Programme. Burchell M; Ruiz F; Barnett D Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Jul; 87(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 16884603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health technology assessment from a Canadian device industry perspective. Ferrusi IL; Ames D; Lim ME; Goeree R J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 19394576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Innovation. How ideas see the light. Health Serv J; 2010 Feb; 120(6195):31. PubMed ID: 20337257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Some alternative perspectives concerning medical technology assessment. Diamond GA J Invasive Cardiol; 1992; 4(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10149903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scanning the horizon of obsolete technologies: possible sources for their identification. Ibargoyen-Roteta N; Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I; Asua J; Benguria-Arrate G; Galnares-Cordero L Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19619342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Breckenridge A; Woods K; Walley T Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Feb; 87(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 20107448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AAMI Standards: A History of Ensuring Medical Technology Quality and Performance. Lewelling J Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017; 51(3):210-211. PubMed ID: 28530882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care. Maier-Hein L; Eisenmann M; Reinke A; Onogur S; Stankovic M; Scholz P; Arbel T; Bogunovic H; Bradley AP; Carass A; Feldmann C; Frangi AF; Full PM; van Ginneken B; Hanbury A; Honauer K; Kozubek M; Landman BA; März K; Maier O; Maier-Hein K; Menze BH; Müller H; Neher PF; Niessen W; Rajpoot N; Sharp GC; Sirinukunwattana K; Speidel S; Stock C; Stoyanov D; Taha AA; van der Sommen F; Wang CW; Weber MA; Zheng G; Jannin P; Kopp-Schneider A Nat Commun; 2018 Dec; 9(1):5217. PubMed ID: 30523263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline. Silva MT; Silva END; Barreto JOM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29884121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]