These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21669722)

  • 1. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae-Rondeletieae-Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae.
    Rova JH; Delprete PG; Andersson L; Albert VA
    Am J Bot; 2002 Jan; 89(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 21669722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards a better understanding of intertribal relationships and stable tribal delimitations within Cinchonoideae s.s. (Rubiaceae).
    Manns U; Bremer B
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Jul; 56(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 20382247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular systematics and morphological character evolution of the Condamineeae (Rubiaceae).
    Kainulainen K; Persson C; Eriksson T; Bremer B
    Am J Bot; 2010 Dec; 97(12):1961-81. PubMed ID: 21616845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae: morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data.
    Andreasen K; Bremer B
    Am J Bot; 2000 Nov; 87(11):1731-48. PubMed ID: 11080124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching for the relatives of Coffea (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae): the circumscription and phylogeny of Coffeeae based on plastid sequence data and morphology.
    Davis AP; Chester M; Maurin O; Fay MF
    Am J Bot; 2007 Mar; 94(3):313-29. PubMed ID: 21636404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PHYLOGENY OF THE RUBIACEAE AND THE LOGANIACEAE: CONGRUENCE OR CONFLICT BETWEEN MORPHOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR DATA?
    Bremer B; Struwe L
    Am J Bot; 1992 Oct; 79(10):1171-1184. PubMed ID: 30139144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid RBCL and TRNL-F DNA sequences.
    Wurdack KJ; Hoffmann P; Chase MW
    Am J Bot; 2005 Aug; 92(8):1397-420. PubMed ID: 21646159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards a more robust molecular phylogeny of Chinese Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: additional evidence from nrDNA ITS and cpDNA intron (rpl16 and rps16) sequences.
    Zhou J; Gong X; Downie SR; Peng H
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 19501179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phylogeny and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and trnL-F sequence data.
    Wallander E; Albert VA
    Am J Bot; 2000 Dec; 87(12):1827-41. PubMed ID: 11118421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular phylogeny of Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae, Mentheae)--Taxonomy, biogeography and conflicts.
    Bräuchler C; Meimberg H; Heubl G
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 May; 55(2):501-23. PubMed ID: 20152913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular phylogenetics of the giant genus Croton and tribe Crotoneae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using ITS and TRNL-TRNF DNA sequence data.
    Berry PE; Hipp AL; Wurdack KJ; Van Ee B; Riina R
    Am J Bot; 2005 Sep; 92(9):1520-34. PubMed ID: 21646170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A phylogeny of the "evil tribe" (Vernonieae: Compositae) reveals Old/New World long distance dispersal: support from separate and combined congruent datasets (trnL-F, ndhF, ITS).
    Keeley SC; Forsman ZH; Chan R
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Jul; 44(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 17292633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/ matK and trnL-trnF sequences.
    Nyffeler R
    Am J Bot; 2002 Feb; 89(2):312-26. PubMed ID: 21669740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A phylogenetic reappraisal of the Peltophorum group (Caesalpinieae: Leguminosae) based on the chloroplast trnL-F, rbcL and rps16 sequence data.
    Haston EM; Lewis GP; Hawkins JA
    Am J Bot; 2005 Aug; 92(8):1359-71. PubMed ID: 21646156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The phylogenetic utility of chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers and the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae tribe Spermacoceae.
    Kårehed J; Groeninckx I; Dessein S; Motley TJ; Bremer B
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Dec; 49(3):843-66. PubMed ID: 18950720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A molecular phylogenetic and fruit evolutionary analysis of the major groups of the paleotropical woody bamboos (Gramineae: Bambusoideae) based on nuclear ITS, GBSSI gene and plastid trnL-F DNA sequences.
    Yang HQ; Yang JB; Peng ZH; Gao J; Yang YM; Peng S; Li DZ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Sep; 48(3):809-24. PubMed ID: 18593600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phylogenetic relationships in Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae sensu stricto based on matK gene, chlL gene, trnL-trnF IGS region, and trnL intron sequences.
    Kusumi J; Tsumura Y; Yoshimaru H; Tachida H
    Am J Bot; 2000 Oct; 87(10):1480-8. PubMed ID: 11034923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multi-locus chloroplast phylogeny for the Cucurbitaceae and its implications for character evolution and classification.
    Kocyan A; Zhang LB; Schaefer H; Renner SS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Aug; 44(2):553-77. PubMed ID: 17321763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards a species level tree of the globally diverse genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae).
    Fuentes-Bazan S; Mansion G; Borsch T
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Jan; 62(1):359-74. PubMed ID: 22051350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecular phylogenetics and generic assessment in the tribe Morindeae (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae): how to circumscribe Morinda L. to be monophyletic?
    Razafimandimbison SG; McDowell TD; Halford DA; Bremer B
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):879-86. PubMed ID: 19394432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.