BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21670087)

  • 1. A random effects branch-site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Murrell B; Fourment M; Frost SD; Delport W; Scheffler K
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):3033-43. PubMed ID: 21670087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection.
    Smith MD; Wertheim JO; Weaver S; Murrell B; Scheffler K; Kosakovsky Pond SL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 May; 32(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 25697341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.
    Zhang J; Nielsen R; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2472-9. PubMed ID: 16107592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical properties of the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Yang Z; dos Reis M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Mar; 28(3):1217-28. PubMed ID: 21087944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene-wide identification of episodic selection.
    Murrell B; Weaver S; Smith MD; Wertheim JO; Murrell S; Aylward A; Eren K; Pollner T; Martin DP; Smith DM; Scheffler K; Kosakovsky Pond SL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 May; 32(5):1365-71. PubMed ID: 25701167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Erasing errors due to alignment ambiguity when estimating positive selection.
    Redelings B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Aug; 31(8):1979-93. PubMed ID: 24866534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not so different after all: a comparison of methods for detecting amino acid sites under selection.
    Kosakovsky Pond SL; Frost SD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1208-22. PubMed ID: 15703242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Pagel M; Meade A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3955-64. PubMed ID: 18852097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 12032247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The branch-site test of positive selection is surprisingly robust but lacks power under synonymous substitution saturation and variation in GC.
    Gharib WH; Robinson-Rechavi M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jul; 30(7):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23558341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of standard and stochastic branch-site models for detecting positive selection among coding sequences.
    Lu A; Guindon S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 24132121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple hypothesis testing to detect lineages under positive selection that affects only a few sites.
    Anisimova M; Yang Z
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 May; 24(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17339634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False-positive results obtained from the branch-site test of positive selection.
    Suzuki Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2008 Aug; 83(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18931458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary Shortcuts via Multinucleotide Substitutions and Their Impact on Natural Selection Analyses.
    Lucaci AG; Zehr JD; Enard D; Thornton JW; Kosakovsky Pond SL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 37395787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Markov-Modulated Continuous-Time Markov Chains to Identify Site- and Branch-Specific Evolutionary Variation in BEAST.
    Baele G; Gill MS; Bastide P; Lemey P; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2021 Jan; 70(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 32415977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating empirical codon hidden Markov models.
    De Maio N; Holmes I; Schlötterer C; Kosiol C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):725-36. PubMed ID: 23188590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes.
    Yang Z; Swanson WJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 11752189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 12116595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood.
    Siepel A; Haussler D
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):468-88. PubMed ID: 14660683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.