These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21670955)
1. Preoperative nodal staging of uterine cancer: is contrast-enhanced PET/CT more accurate than non-enhanced PET/CT or enhanced CT alone? Kitajima K; Suzuki K; Senda M; Kita M; Nakamoto Y; Sakamoto S; Onishi Y; Maeda T; Yoshikawa T; Ohno Y; Suganuma N; Sugimura K Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Aug; 25(7):511-9. PubMed ID: 21670955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI. Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Ueno Y; Kanda T; Maeda T; Takahashi S; Ebina Y; Miyahara Y; Yamada H; Sugimura K Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1672-6. PubMed ID: 23727380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for the diagnosis of uterine cancer recurrence. Kitajima K; Suzuki K; Nakamoto Y; Onishi Y; Sakamoto S; Senda M; Kita M; Sugimura K Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(8):1490-8. PubMed ID: 20386901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of FDG PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in Initial Staging of Colorectal Cancer - Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT. Kunawudhi A; Sereeborwornthanasak K; Promteangtrong C; Siripongpreeda B; Vanprom S; Chotipanich C Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(8):4071-5. PubMed ID: 27644663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of (11)C-choline PET/CT in preoperative lymph node staging of bladder cancer: a systematic comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and histologic findings. Brunocilla E; Ceci F; Schiavina R; Castellucci P; Maffione AM; Cevenini M; Bianchi L; Borghesi M; Giunchi F; Fiorentino M; Chondrogiannis S; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Fanti S; Martorana G Clin Nucl Med; 2014 May; 39(5):e308-12. PubMed ID: 24458183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis in the restaging of patient with ovarian cancer as compared to contrast enhanced CT and tumor marker Ca-125. Rubini G; Altini C; Notaristefano A; Merenda N; Rubini D; Ianora AA; Asabella AN Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23948509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in preoperative lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Xu N; Wang M; Zhu Z; Zhang Y; Jiao Y; Fang W Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 24534208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-enhanced CT versus contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT studies for nodal staging of rectal cancer. Tateishi U; Maeda T; Morimoto T; Miyake M; Arai Y; Kim EE Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Oct; 34(10):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17530248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Rodrigues RS; Bozza FA; Christian PE; Hoffman JM; Butterfield RI; Christensen CR; Heilbrun M; Wiggins RH; Hunt JP; Bentz BG; Hitchcock YJ; Morton KA J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1205-13. PubMed ID: 19617339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose non-enhanced CT versus full-dose contrast-enhanced CT in integrated PET/CT scans for diagnosing ovarian cancer recurrence. Kitajima K; Ueno Y; Suzuki K; Kita M; Ebina Y; Yamada H; Senda M; Maeda T; Sugimura K Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3557-62. PubMed ID: 22534465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nodal status of malignant lymphoma in pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphatic pathways: comparison of integrated PET/CT with or without contrast enhancement. Morimoto T; Tateishi U; Maeda T; Arai Y; Nakajima Y; Edmund Kim E Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):508-13. PubMed ID: 17904324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-modality PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT imaging for pancreatic cancer. Zhang J; Zuo CJ; Jia NY; Wang JH; Hu SP; Yu ZF; Zheng Y; Zhang AY; Feng XY World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Mar; 21(10):2988-96. PubMed ID: 25780297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT. Kim EY; Lee WJ; Choi D; Lee SJ; Choi JY; Kim BT; Kim HS Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 20226612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of Tsuyoshi H; Tsujikawa T; Yamada S; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y Cancer Imaging; 2020 Oct; 20(1):75. PubMed ID: 33092631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Horowitz NS; Dehdashti F; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Powell MA; Gibb RK; Grigsby PW; Siegel BA; Mutch DG Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15581961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial staging of Hodgkin's disease: role of contrast-enhanced 18F FDG PET/CT. Chiaravalloti A; Danieli R; Caracciolo CR; Travascio L; Cantonetti M; Gallamini A; Guazzaroni M; Orlacchio A; Simonetti G; Schillaci O Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Aug; 93(8):e50. PubMed ID: 25121354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of (11)C-choline PET/CT and enhanced CT in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary abnormalities and locoregional lymph node involvement in lung cancer. Peng Z; Liu Q; Li M; Han M; Yao S; Liu Q Clin Lung Cancer; 2012 Jul; 13(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 22182444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the initial evaluation of cervical node level of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT. Jeong HS; Baek CH; Son YI; Choi JY; Kim HJ; Ko YH; Chung JH; Baek HJ Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 65(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 16918964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]