These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21671139)

  • 1. Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling.
    Ryu E
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1066-74. PubMed ID: 21671139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the ADF fit function decrease when the kurtosis increases?
    Olsson UH; Foss T; Troye SV
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):289-303. PubMed ID: 14633337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model.
    Molenaar D; Dolan CV; Verhelst ND
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):293-317. PubMed ID: 19796474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting Too Much or Too Little? The Performance of Three Chi-Square Corrections.
    Foldnes N; Olsson UH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):533-43. PubMed ID: 26610251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonrandom sampling in human genetics: skewness and kurtosis.
    Chakraborty R; Hanis CL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 3582959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
    Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.
    Jobst LJ; Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 35014004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where is the likelihood ratio test powerful for detecting two component normal mixtures?
    Mendell NR; Finch SJ; Thode HC
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 8241377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data.
    Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):352-67. PubMed ID: 20853954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpreting statistical evidence with empirical likelihood functions.
    Zhang Z
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):710-20. PubMed ID: 19650056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing experimental data for univariate normality.
    Henderson AR
    Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Apr; 366(1-2):112-29. PubMed ID: 16388793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of kurtosis on the power of two test statistics in covariance structure analysis.
    Foldnes N; Olsson UH; Foss T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 22233173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on permutation tests for variance components in multilevel generalized linear mixed models.
    Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):942-6. PubMed ID: 17403100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood approach for detecting imprinting and in utero maternal effects using general pedigrees from prospective family-based association studies.
    Yang J; Lin S
    Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 22008205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fitting data to model: structural equation modeling diagnosis using two scatter plots.
    Yuan KH; Hayashi K
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):335-51. PubMed ID: 20853955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Problematic standard errors and confidence intervals for skewness and kurtosis.
    Wright DB; Herrington JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 21298573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.