These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21671501)

  • 1. Field study of hydrogeologic characterization methods in a heterogeneous aquifer.
    Alexander M; Berg SJ; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(3):365-82. PubMed ID: 21671501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Hydraulic Conductivity Estimates from Various Approaches with Groundwater Flow Models.
    Sun D; Luo N; Vandenhoff A; McCall W; Zhao Z; Wang C; Rudolph DL; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):384-404. PubMed ID: 37605321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined use of field and laboratory testing to predict preferred flow paths in an heterogeneous aquifer.
    Gierczak RF; Devlin JF; Rudolph DL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):75-98. PubMed ID: 16246459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hydraulic Tomography: Continuity and Discontinuity of High-K and Low-K Zones.
    Hochstetler DL; Barrash W; Leven C; Cardiff M; Chidichimo F; Kitanidis PK
    Ground Water; 2016 Mar; 54(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 26096272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hydraulic tomography with traditional methods at a highly heterogeneous site.
    Berg SJ; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 24428358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The steady-state dipole-flow test for characterization of hydraulic conductivity statistics in a highly permeable aquifer: Horkheimer Insel site, Germany.
    Zlotnik VA; Zurbuchen BR; Ptak T
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(4):504-16. PubMed ID: 11447851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of steady-state hydraulic tomography to inform the selection of a chaotic advection system.
    Cho MS; Zhao Z; Thomson NR; Illman WA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Feb; 229():103559. PubMed ID: 31784037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Type-Curve Method for the Analysis of Pumping Tests with Piecewise-Linear Pumping Rates.
    Zhuang C; Li Y; Zhou Z; Illman WA; Dou Z; Wang J; Yan L
    Ground Water; 2020 Sep; 58(5):788-798. PubMed ID: 31970755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hydraulic Tomography: 3D Hydraulic Conductivity, Fracture Network, and Connectivity in Mudstone.
    Tiedeman CR; Barrash W
    Ground Water; 2020 Mar; 58(2):238-257. PubMed ID: 31187873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds.
    Landon MK; Rus DL; Harvey FE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(6):870-85. PubMed ID: 11708453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of storm events on a riverbed system and its hydraulic conductivity at a site of induced infiltration.
    Levy J; Birck MD; Mutiti S; Kilroy KC; Windeler B; Idris O; Allen LN
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):1960-71. PubMed ID: 21492996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of specific yield for the Biscayne Aquifer with a canal-drawdown test.
    Bolster CH; Genereux DP; Saiers JE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 11554256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydraulic tomography offers improved imaging of heterogeneity in fractured rocks.
    Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(5):659-84. PubMed ID: 24749939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-flow hydraulic conductivity tests at wells that cross the water table.
    Aragon-Jose AT; Robbins GA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 20726899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow depletion in a small stream caused by ground water abstraction from wells.
    Nyholm T; Christense S; Rasmussen KR
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 12113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity.
    Parker BL; Cherry JA; Chapman SW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):197-230. PubMed ID: 15358493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-Screened Vertical Circulation Wells for Groundwater Lowering in Unconfined Aquifers.
    Jin Y; Holzbecher E; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25801278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of approaches for predicting solute transport: sandbox experiments.
    Illman WA; Berg SJ; Yeh TC
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 21883194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for aquifer heterogeneity from geological data to management tools.
    Blouin M; Martel R; Gloaguen E
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 22924605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of aquifer hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of Ezza/Ikwo area, Southeastern Nigeria, using pumping test and surficial resistivity techniques.
    Oli IC; Opara AI; Okeke OC; Akaolisa CZ; Akakuru OC; Osi-Okeke I; Udeh HM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Sep; 194(10):719. PubMed ID: 36053394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.