These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21671712)

  • 1. Effects of cyclic loading on the bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a porcelain surface using different conditioning protocols.
    Abdelnaby YL
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):1064-9. PubMed ID: 21671712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to porcelain surface using different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study.
    Girish PV; Dinesh U; Bhat CS; Shetty PC
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 23151698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cyclic loading on the shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to resin composite veneer surface using different conditioning protocols.
    Hammad SM; El Banna MS
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Jun; 14():14. PubMed ID: 24326176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces.
    Schmage P; Nergiz I; Herrmann W; Ozcan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 12750673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns.
    Blakey R; Mah J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20620836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of porcelain surface conditioning on bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Ajlouni R; Bishara SE; Oonsombat C; Soliman M; Laffoon J
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):858-64. PubMed ID: 16283817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid.
    Yassaei S; Moradi F; Aghili H; Kamran MH
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e82-7. PubMed ID: 23646342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces.
    Kocadereli I; Canay S; Akça K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 11395705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of ceramic surface treatment on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets.
    Ramos TF; Lenza MA; Reges RR; Freitas G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 23649065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength of metal brackets bonded to a silica-based ceramic with light-cured adhesive : Influence of various surface treatment methods.
    Zhang ZC; Qian YF; Yang YM; Feng QP; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):366-72. PubMed ID: 27444314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength.
    Ozcan M; Vallittu PK; Peltomäki T; Huysmans MC; Kalk W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 15316478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of ceramic (feldspathic) surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin.
    Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Borges GA; Roberts WE
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):765-70. PubMed ID: 20482366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface.
    Suma S; Anita G; Chandra Shekar BR; Kallury A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22945715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin.
    Stewart GP; Jain P; Hodges J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12426497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of the effect of Er:YAG and Er:Cr;YSGG lasers on porcelain: etching for the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Mirhashemi A; Chiniforush N; Jadidi H; Sharifi N
    Lasers Med Sci; 2018 Dec; 33(9):1997-2005. PubMed ID: 29980947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to surface-treated feldspathic porcelain after thermocycling.
    Cevik P; Eraslan O; Eser K; Tekeli S
    Int J Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 41(3):160-167. PubMed ID: 29546812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four chemical methods of porcelain conditioning and their influence over bond strength and surface integrity.
    Stella JP; Oliveira AB; Nojima LI; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(4):51-6. PubMed ID: 26352845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain.
    Bourke BM; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Dec; 26(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 10592155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.