These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21671792)

  • 1. The dependence of spike field coherence on expected intensity.
    Lepage KQ; Kramer MA; Eden UT
    Neural Comput; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2209-41. PubMed ID: 21671792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical-mechanical measure of stochastic spiking coherence in a population of inhibitory subthreshold neurons.
    Lim W; Kim SY
    J Comput Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(3):667-77. PubMed ID: 21538140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Including long-range dependence in integrate-and-fire models of the high interspike-interval variability of cortical neurons.
    Jackson BS
    Neural Comput; 2004 Oct; 16(10):2125-95. PubMed ID: 15333210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved measures of phase-coupling between spikes and the Local Field Potential.
    Vinck M; Battaglia FP; Womelsdorf T; Pennartz C
    J Comput Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 33(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 22187161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferring oscillatory modulation in neural spike trains.
    Arai K; Kass RE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Oct; 13(10):e1005596. PubMed ID: 28985231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate-adjusted spike-LFP coherence comparisons from spike-train statistics.
    Aoi MC; Lepage KQ; Kramer MA; Eden UT
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 240():141-53. PubMed ID: 25460189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross nearest-spike interval based method to measure synchrony dynamics.
    Montoro AM; Cao R; Faes C; Molenberghs G; Espinosa N; Cudeiro J; Marino J
    Math Biosci Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 24245679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the correlation between bursty spike trains and local field potentials.
    Li Z; Ouyang G; Yao L; Li X
    Neural Netw; 2014 Sep; 57():63-72. PubMed ID: 24945471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dependence of neuronal correlations on filter characteristics and marginal spike train statistics.
    Tetzlaff T; Rotter S; Stark E; Abeles M; Aertsen A; Diesmann M
    Neural Comput; 2008 Sep; 20(9):2133-84. PubMed ID: 18439140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A procedure for testing across-condition rhythmic spike-field association change.
    Lepage KQ; Gregoriou GG; Kramer MA; Aoi M; Gotts SJ; Eden UT; Desimone R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Feb; 213(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 23164959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuronal ensemble synchrony during human focal seizures.
    Truccolo W; Ahmed OJ; Harrison MT; Eskandar EN; Cosgrove GR; Madsen JR; Blum AS; Potter NS; Hochberg LR; Cash SS
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 34(30):9927-44. PubMed ID: 25057195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary sensorimotor cortex exhibits complex dependencies of spike-field coherence on neuronal firing rates, field power, and behavior.
    Arce-McShane FI; Sessle BJ; Ross CF; Hatsopoulos NG
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Jul; 120(1):226-238. PubMed ID: 29589815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fano factor estimation.
    Rajdl K; Lansky P
    Math Biosci Eng; 2014 Feb; 11(1):105-23. PubMed ID: 24245675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the stability and dynamics of stochastic spiking neuron models: Nonlinear Hawkes process and point process GLMs.
    Gerhard F; Deger M; Truccolo W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005390. PubMed ID: 28234899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying Neural Oscillatory Synchronization: A Comparison between Spectral Coherence and Phase-Locking Value Approaches.
    Lowet E; Roberts MJ; Bonizzi P; Karel J; De Weerd P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146443. PubMed ID: 26745498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of Bayesian methods for neural spike train analysis.
    Chen Z
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2013; 2013():251905. PubMed ID: 24348527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correcting the bias of spike field coherence estimators due to a finite number of spikes.
    Grasse DW; Moxon KA
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul; 104(1):548-58. PubMed ID: 20484529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Statistical Model for In Vivo Neuronal Dynamics.
    Surace SC; Pfister JP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142435. PubMed ID: 26571371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Do Spike Collisions Affect Spike Sorting Performance?
    Garcia S; Buccino AP; Yger P
    eNeuro; 2022; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 36171060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unbiased and robust quantification of synchronization between spikes and local field potential.
    Li Z; Cui D; Li X
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Aug; 269():33-8. PubMed ID: 27180930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.