These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21672024)

  • 1. Taxonomic and geographic patterns of decline for threatened and endangered species in the United States.
    Leidner AK; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):716-25. PubMed ID: 21672024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biological framework for evaluating whether a species is threatened or endangered in a significant portion of its range.
    Waples RS; Adams PB; Bohnsack J; Taylor BL
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 17650247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.
    Field IC; Meekan MG; Buckworth RC; Bradshaw CJ
    Adv Mar Biol; 2009; 56():275-363. PubMed ID: 19895977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
    Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The capacity of Australia's protected-area system to represent threatened species.
    Watson JE; Evans MC; Carwardine J; Fuller RA; Joseph LN; Segan DB; Taylor MF; Fensham RJ; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 20961332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regional decline of an iconic amphibian associated with elevation, land-use change, and invasive species.
    Johnson PT; McKenzie VJ; Peterson AC; Kerby JL; Brown J; Blaustein AR; Jackson T
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):556-66. PubMed ID: 21342266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species.
    Channell R; Lomolino MV
    Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6765):84-6. PubMed ID: 10638757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of congeneric assessment to reveal the linked genetic histories of two threatened fishes in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia.
    Adams M; Wedderburn SD; Unmack PJ; Hammer MP; Johnson JB
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):767-76. PubMed ID: 21676026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting recovery criteria for threatened and endangered plant species on the basis of past abundances and biological traits.
    Neel MC; Che-Castaldo JP
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Apr; 27(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 23293869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Range size heritability in Carnivora is driven by geographic constraints.
    Machac A; Zrzavý J; Storch D
    Am Nat; 2011 Jun; 177(6):767-79. PubMed ID: 21597253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing decision rules for categorizing species' extinction risk to help develop quantitative listing criteria for the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Regan TJ; Taylor BL; Thompson GG; Cochrane JF; Ralls K; Runge MC; Merrick R
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):821-31. PubMed ID: 23646933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part I. Acute toxicity of five chemicals.
    Dwyer FJ; Mayer FL; Sappington LC; Buckler DR; Bridges CM; Greer IE; Hardesty DK; Henke CE; Ingersoll CG; Kunz JL; Whites DW; Augspurger T; Mount DR; Hattala K; Neuderfer GN
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 48(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 15772881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability in population abundance and the classification of extinction risk.
    Wilson HB; Kendall BE; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 21480994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond.
    Eckert CG; Samis KE; Lougheed SC
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Mar; 17(5):1170-88. PubMed ID: 18302683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraspecific chromosome number variation: a neglected threat to the conservation of rare plants.
    Severns PM; Liston A
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1641-7. PubMed ID: 18798860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic and phenotypic variation among geographically isolated populations of the globally threatened Dupont's lark Chersophilus duponti.
    García JT; Suárez F; Garza V; Calero-Riestra M; Hernández J; Pérez-Tris J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):237-51. PubMed ID: 17719801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Haig SM; Beever EA; Chambers SM; Draheim HM; Dugger BD; Dunham S; Elliott-Smith E; Fontaine JB; Kesler DC; Knaus BJ; Lopes IF; Loschl P; Mullins TD; Sheffield LM
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17181793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multilocus population genetic survey of the greater sage-grouse across their range.
    Oyler-McCance SJ; Taylor SE; Quinn TW
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1293-310. PubMed ID: 15813771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.