These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21673445)

  • 1. Ergonomic evaluation of ten single-channel pipettes.
    Lichty MG; Janowitz IL; Rempel DM
    Work; 2011; 39(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 21673445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User-oriented evaluation of mechanical single-channel axial pipettes.
    Sormunen E; Nevala N
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):785-91. PubMed ID: 23414671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thumb force and muscle loads are influenced by the design of a mechanical pipette and by pipetting tasks.
    Asundi KR; Bach JM; Rempel DM
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 15960087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of two alternative arm supports on shoulder and upper back muscle loading during pipetting.
    Rempel P; Janowitz I; Alexandre M; Lee DL; Rempel D
    Work; 2011; 39(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 21673447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A questionnaire survey of the ergonomic problems associated with pipettes and their usage with specific reference to work-related upper limb disorders.
    David G; Buckle P
    Appl Ergon; 1997 Aug; 28(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 9414365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of an ergonomic four-finger-push manual pipette design.
    Kim E; Aqlan F; Freivalds A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103045. PubMed ID: 32174341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ergonomic evaluation of manual Cleco plier designs: effects of rubber grip, spring recoil, and worksurface angle.
    You H; Kumar A; Young R; Veluswamy P; Malzahn DE
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Sep; 36(5):575-83. PubMed ID: 15970202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manual application of controlled forces to thoracic and lumbar spine with a device: rated comfort for the receiver's back and the applier's hands.
    Waddington G; Lau G; Adams R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Jun; 30(5):365-73. PubMed ID: 17574954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the intra- and inter-individual imprecision of manual pipetting.
    Lippi G; Lima-Oliveira G; Brocco G; Bassi A; Salvagno GL
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 55(7):962-966. PubMed ID: 27816957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of comfort, discomfort, and continuum ratings of force levels and hand regions during gripping exertions.
    Kong YK; Kim DM; Lee KS; Jung MC
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Mar; 43(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 21696703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ergonomic design and performance evaluation of pipettes.
    Lee YH; Jiang MS
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Dec; 30(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 10693828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ergonomic assessment of musculoskeletal discomfort of iron workers in highway construction.
    Choi SD
    Work; 2010; 36(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20555175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability.
    Sonderegger A; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2010 May; 41(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 19892317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One set of pliers for more tasks in installation work: the effects on (dis)comfort and productivity.
    Groenesteijn L; Eikhout SM; Vink P
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Sep; 35(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 15246887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of two hospital bed design features on physical demands and usability during brake engagement and patient transportation: a repeated measures experimental study.
    Kim S; Barker LM; Jia B; Agnew MJ; Nussbaum MA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 19027904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ergonomic redesign and evaluation of a clamping tool handle.
    Jung MC; Hallbeck MS
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Sep; 36(5):619-24. PubMed ID: 15970206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of usability in product choice: a mobile phone case study.
    Mack Z; Sharples S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1514-28. PubMed ID: 19941184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory work with automatic pipettes: a study on how pipetting affects the thumb.
    Fredriksson K
    Ergonomics; 1995 May; 38(5):1067-73. PubMed ID: 7737101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between objective and subjective measurements of comfort and discomfort in hand tools.
    Kuijt-Evers LF; Bosch T; Huysmans MA; de Looze MP; Vink P
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Sep; 38(5):643-54. PubMed ID: 17010301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. User information seeking behaviour: perceptions and reality. An evaluation of the WHO Labresources Internet portal.
    Madle G; Berger A; Cognat S; Menna S; Kostkova P
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2009 Jan; 34(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 19306197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.