189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21674192)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in assessing tumor regression and identifying complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.
Aker M; Boone D; Chandramohan A; Sizer B; Motson R; Arulampalam T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Dec; 43(12):3213-3219. PubMed ID: 29767284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with endorectal coil for local staging of rectal cancer.
Tamakawa M; Kawaai Y; Shirase R; Satoh T; Akiba H; Hyodoh H; Hareyama M; Furuhata T; Hirata K; Hasegawa T
Jpn J Radiol; 2010 May; 28(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 20512547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic performance of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Yano H; Gohda Y; Shuno Y
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Jan; 18(1):4. PubMed ID: 29378659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].
Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Xiao X; Zhuang X; Yu S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):786-792. PubMed ID: 30051447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in staging early and locally advanced rectal cancer.
Arndt K; Vigna C; Kaul S; Fabrizio A; Cataldo T; Smith M; Messaris E
Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 50():101987. PubMed ID: 37717374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of high-resolution rectal magnetic resonance imaging re-staging with histopathology in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Laohawiriyakamol S; Worathanmanon S; Tubtawee T; Kanjanapradit K; Sangkhathat S; Pruphetkaew N; Chongsuvivatwong V
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):275-279. PubMed ID: 32712044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of early rectal cancers: how well does it work in practice?
Oien K; Forsmo HM; Rösler C; Nylund K; Waage JE; Pfeffer F
Acta Oncol; 2019; 58(sup1):S49-S54. PubMed ID: 30736712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI to diagnose a local tumour regrowth during long-term follow-up of rectal cancer patients treated with organ preservation after chemoradiotherapy.
Lambregts DM; Lahaye MJ; Heijnen LA; Martens MH; Maas M; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2118-25. PubMed ID: 26518582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of 1.5T and 3T Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Detecting Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
Min JY; Ko SM; Song IY; Yi JG; Hwang HK; Shin JK
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1007-1020. PubMed ID: 30386133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Initial experience of 3 Tesla versus conventional field strength magnetic resonance imaging of small functioning pituitary tumours.
Stobo DB; Lindsay RS; Connell JM; Dunn L; Forbes KP
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2011 Nov; 75(5):673-7. PubMed ID: 21609346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot.
Sormaala MJ; Ruohola JP; Mattila VM; Koskinen SK; Pihlajamäki HK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2011 Jun; 12():128. PubMed ID: 21645348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison between 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance enterography for the assessment of disease activity and complications in ileo-colonic Crohn's disease.
Fiorino G; Bonifacio C; Padrenostro M; Sposta FM; Spinelli A; Malesci A; Balzarini L; Peyrin-Biroulet L; Danese S
Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(11):3246-55. PubMed ID: 23903867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MRI surveillance for the detection of local recurrence in rectal cancer after transanal endoscopic microsurgery.
Hupkens BJP; Maas M; Martens MH; Deserno WMLLG; Leijtens JWA; Nelemans PJ; Bakers FCH; Lambregts DMJ; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RGH
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):4960-4969. PubMed ID: 28667480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inter-observer agreement of MRI-based tumor delineation for preoperative radiotherapy boost in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Burbach JP; Kleijnen JP; Reerink O; Seravalli E; Philippens ME; Schakel T; van Asselen B; Raaymakers BW; van Vulpen M; Intven M
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Feb; 118(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 26700601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of optimised 3D turbo spin echo and gradient echo MR pulse sequences of the knee at 3T and 1.5T.
Abdulaal OM; Rainford L; MacMahon PJ; Kenny P; Carty F; Galligan M; Cradock A; Alhazmi FH; McGee A
Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):389-397. PubMed ID: 33036913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diffusion-weighted MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study.
Lambregts DM; Vandecaveye V; Barbaro B; Bakers FC; Lambrecht M; Maas M; Haustermans K; Valentini V; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2224-31. PubMed ID: 21347783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the Extent of Mesorectal Invasion and Mesorectal Fascia Involvement in Patients with T3 Rectal Cancer With 2-D and 3-D Transrectal Ultrasound: A Pilot Comparison Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.
Liu M; Yin S; Li Q; Liu Y; Pei X; Han F; Li AH; Zhou J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 46(11):3008-3016. PubMed ID: 32868155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
