BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21675934)

  • 1. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: aspects of a single unit's experience of 777 cases.
    Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 21675934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.
    Spencer JM; Chauhan SK; Sloan K; Taylor A; Beaver RJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 17463115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. PubMed ID: 21958937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.
    Hoffart HE; Langenstein E; Vasak N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22323685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Khan MM; Khan MW; Al-Harbi HH; Weening BS; Zalzal PK
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21704485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.
    Biasca N; Schneider TO; Bungartz M
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):537-63, x. PubMed ID: 19773060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
    Bové JC
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional results of navigated minimally invasive and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a comparison in bilateral cases.
    Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Bae BH; Cho SG
    Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S145-7. PubMed ID: 17407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: the learning curve.
    Smith BR; Deakin AH; Baines J; Picard F
    Comput Aided Surg; 2010; 15(1-3):40-8. PubMed ID: 20500099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery.
    Kalairajah Y; Simpson D; Cossey AJ; Verrall GM; Spriggins AJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Nov; 87(11):1480-2. PubMed ID: 16260662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
    Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
    Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
    Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes.
    Hamel MB; Toth M; Legedza A; Rosen MP
    Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 168(13):1430-40. PubMed ID: 18625924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty in a community setting.
    Carter RE; Rush PF; Smid JA; Smith WL
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 18534523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis for the treatment of medial compartment knee disease: 2 to 5 year follow-up.
    Heller S; Fenichel I; Salai M; Luria T; Velkes S
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 May; 11(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 19637502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA-D): comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC in a prospective evaluation in patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
    Kirschner S; Walther M; Böhm D; Matzer M; Heesen T; Faller H; König A
    Rheumatol Int; 2003 Jan; 23(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12548437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative analysis of patient-centered outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty].
    Wollmerstedt N; Glatzel M; Kirschner S; Schneider J; Faller H; König A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 16991061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.