These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21676493)

  • 1. [Comparison of Lasik with femtosecond laser versus Lasik with mechanical microkeratome: predictability of flap depth, corneal biomechanical effects and optical aberrations].
    Kouassi FX; Blaizeau M; Buestel C; Schweitzer C; Gallois A; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Jan; 35(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 21676493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.
    Hamilton DR; Johnson RD; Lee N; Bourla N
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19027558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
    Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
    Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.
    Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
    Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Wu D; Wang Y; Zhang L; Wei S; Tang X
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):954-62. PubMed ID: 24751146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Ziemer FEMTO LDV femtosecond laser and Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome.
    Zhou Y; Zhang J; Tian L; Zhai C
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 22373033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    von Jagow B; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flap and stromal bed thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement.
    Muallem MS; Yoo SH; Romano AC; Marangon FB; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2295-302. PubMed ID: 15519078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
    Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.
    Wang Y; Li J; Liu Y; Xie L
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 23909780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of corneal flap morphology using AS-OCT in LASIK with the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.
    Zhang Y; Chen YG; Xia YJ
    J Refract Surg; 2013 May; 29(5):320-4. PubMed ID: 23659230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.
    Rosa AM; Neto Murta J; Quadrado MJ; Tavares C; Lobo C; Van Velze R; Castanheira-Dinis A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):833-8. PubMed ID: 19393881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the depth predictability of intra corneal ring segment implantation by mechanical versus femtosecond laser-assisted techniques using optical coherence tomography (OCT Visante(®))].
    Kouassi FX; Buestel C; Raman B; Melinte D; Touboul D; Gallois A; Colin J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Feb; 35(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 21664715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Safety of the automated microkeratome for Sub-Bowman's Keratomileusis on the flat cornea].
    Falcon C; Norero Martinez M
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Feb; 39(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26549141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
    Eldaly ZH; Abdelsalam MA; Hussein MS; Nassr MA
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):113-121. PubMed ID: 30977320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change in biomechanical parameters after flap creation using the Intralase femtosecond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation.
    Uzbek AK; Kamburoğlu G; Mahmoud AM; Roberts CJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2011 Jul; 36(7):614-9. PubMed ID: 21657826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.