102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21676579)
1. Load dispersion effects of acetabular reinforcement devices used in revision total hip arthroplasty: a simulation study using finite element analysis.
Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Goto K; Maeno S; Nakamura T
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1061-6. PubMed ID: 21676579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.
Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Tsukanaka M; Kawanabe K; Otsuka H; So K; Goto K; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimized design for a novel acetabular component with three wings. A study of finite element analysis.
Ma W; Zhang X; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chen W; Zhang Y
J Surg Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 22995660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Krbec M; Adler J; Messner P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.
Gibon E; Kerboull L; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Int Orthop; 2019 Mar; 43(3):561-571. PubMed ID: 30218182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reconstruction of the acetabulum during replacement of the aseptically loosened polyethylene cup].
Koudela K; Malotín T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11706538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pitfalls in the use of acetabular reinforcement rings in total hip revision.
Bader R; Mittelmeier W; Zeiler G; Tokar I; Steinhauser E; Schuh A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Oct; 125(8):558-63. PubMed ID: 16189686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years.
Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Onishi E; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 17259411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Long-term results of primary hip total prosthesis with acetabulum reinforcement ring].
Aebi M; Richner L; Ganz R
Orthopade; 1989 Nov; 18(6):504-10. PubMed ID: 2608270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application of acetabulum reinforcement ring for reconstructing acetabular defects in artificial hip replacement].
Han W; Zhang H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 23(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19275103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of acetabular reinforcement ring with hook for acetabular dysplasia clarified by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zhao X; Chosa E; Yamako G; Watanabe S; Deng G; Totoribe K
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1765-9. PubMed ID: 23993349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Complications with the acetabular cup in the CLS total hip joint endoprosthesis].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Deduch J; Hudecek F
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11706722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular revision. The role of rings and cages.
Schatzker J; Wong MK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Dec; (369):187-97. PubMed ID: 10611874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision of type III and type IVB acetabular defects with Burch-Schneider anti-Protrusio cages.
Ilyas I; Alrumaih HA; Kashif S; Rabbani SA; Faqihi AH
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Feb; 30(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 25280395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reconstruction of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty].
Yang B; Lin J; Weng XS; Jin J; Zhao Q; Qiu GX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 47(12):920-3. PubMed ID: 19781247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does an enhanced surface finish improve acetabular fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty?
Jamieson ML; Russell RD; Incavo SJ; Noble PC
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20647161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The anatomical study of safe zones of the screw fixations in acetabular revision surgery].
Zhang JB; Chen BC; Wang F; Sun R; Zhao BH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 47(9):693-6. PubMed ID: 19615241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
