These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21676999)

  • 1. Sound fields in complex listening environments.
    Vorländer M
    Trends Amplif; 2011 Sep; 15(3):106-15. PubMed ID: 21676999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefit of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Signal Enhancement for Speech Reception in Complex Listening Situations.
    Jansen T; Hartog L; Oetting D; Hohmann V; Kayser H
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241271407. PubMed ID: 39397631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.
    Best V; Mejia J; Freeston K; van Hoesel RJ; Dillon H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):727-35. PubMed ID: 26140298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
    Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Music and hearing aids--an introduction.
    Chasin M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 23258616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.
    Hockley NS; Bahlmann F; Fulton B
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):146-58. PubMed ID: 23258618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musicians and hearing aid design--is your hearing instrument being overworked?
    Schmidt M
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 23258617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
    Kim G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
    Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.