385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21679424)
1. Short read Illumina data for the de novo assembly of a non-model snail species transcriptome (Radix balthica, Basommatophora, Pulmonata), and a comparison of assembler performance.
Feldmeyer B; Wheat CW; Krezdorn N; Rotter B; Pfenninger M
BMC Genomics; 2011 Jun; 12():317. PubMed ID: 21679424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data.
Kumar S; Blaxter ML
BMC Genomics; 2010 Oct; 11():571. PubMed ID: 20950480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assembly and annotation of a non-model gastropod (Nerita melanotragus) transcriptome: a comparison of de novo assemblers.
Amin S; Prentis PJ; Gilding EK; Pavasovic A
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Aug; 7():488. PubMed ID: 25084827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of transcriptome assembly methods for non-model organisms.
Huang X; Chen XG; Armbruster PA
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():523. PubMed ID: 27464550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating characteristics of de novo assembly software on 454 transcriptome data: a simulation approach.
Mundry M; Bornberg-Bauer E; Sammeth M; Feulner PG
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31410. PubMed ID: 22384018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of the complex transcriptome from the highly polyploid sugarcane genome using full-length isoform sequencing and de novo assembly from short read sequencing.
Hoang NV; Furtado A; Mason PJ; Marquardt A; Kasirajan L; Thirugnanasambandam PP; Botha FC; Henry RJ
BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 28532419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the PacBio RS platform for sequencing and de novo assembly of a chloroplast genome.
Ferrarini M; Moretto M; Ward JA; Šurbanovski N; Stevanović V; Giongo L; Viola R; Cavalieri D; Velasco R; Cestaro A; Sargent DJ
BMC Genomics; 2013 Oct; 14():670. PubMed ID: 24083400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcriptome assembly for a colour-polymorphic grasshopper (Gomphocerus sibiricus) with a very large genome size.
Shah A; Hoffman JI; Schielzeth H
BMC Genomics; 2019 May; 20(1):370. PubMed ID: 31088494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of next generation sequencing technologies for transcriptome assembly and utility for RNA-Seq in a non-model bird.
Finseth FR; Harrison RG
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108550. PubMed ID: 25279728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compacting and correcting Trinity and Oases RNA-Seq
Cabau C; Escudié F; Djari A; Guiguen Y; Bobe J; Klopp C
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e2988. PubMed ID: 28224052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. De novo assembly of the Indian blue peacock (Pavo cristatus) genome using Oxford Nanopore technology and Illumina sequencing.
Dhar R; Seethy A; Pethusamy K; Singh S; Rohil V; Purkayastha K; Mukherjee I; Goswami S; Singh R; Raj A; Srivastava T; Acharya S; Rajashekhar B; Karmakar S
Gigascience; 2019 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 31077316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deep sequencing of the transcriptomes of soybean aphid and associated endosymbionts.
Liu S; Chougule NP; Vijayendran D; Bonning BC
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45161. PubMed ID: 22984624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms.
Haznedaroglu BZ; Reeves D; Rismani-Yazdi H; Peccia J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():170. PubMed ID: 22808927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. De novo transcriptome assembly for a non-model species, the blood-sucking bug Triatoma brasiliensis, a vector of Chagas disease.
Marchant A; Mougel F; Almeida C; Jacquin-Joly E; Costa J; Harry M
Genetica; 2015 Apr; 143(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 25233990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ClusTrast: a short read de novo transcript isoform assembler guided by clustered contigs.
Westrin KJ; Kretzschmar WW; Emanuelsson O
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):54. PubMed ID: 38302873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CStone: A de novo transcriptome assembler for short-read data that identifies non-chimeric contigs based on underlying graph structure.
Linheiro R; Archer J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Nov; 17(11):e1009631. PubMed ID: 34813594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
