These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21679640)
1. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the re-excision lumpectomy rate in patients with palpable breast cancers. Davis KM; Hsu CH; Bouton ME; Wilhelmson KL; Komenaka IK Am Surg; 2011 Jun; 77(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 21679640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers. Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Smitt MC; Horst K Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. Moore MM; Whitney LA; Cerilli L; Imbrie JZ; Bunch M; Simpson VB; Hanks JB Ann Surg; 2001 Jun; 233(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 11371734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery. Karanlik H; Ozgur I; Sahin D; Fayda M; Onder S; Yavuz E World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 13():321. PubMed ID: 26596699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discordance between pathologic and radiologic tumor size on breast MRI may contribute to increased re-excision rates. Vanderwalde LH; Dang CM; Bresee C; Phillips EH Am Surg; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1361-3. PubMed ID: 22127089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Boughey JC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Grant CS; Farley DR; Thomsen KM; Osborn JB; Keeney GL; Habermann EB Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 24929768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review of re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma. Gupta A; Subhas G; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Gorieil Y; Mittal VK Am Surg; 2010 Jul; 76(7):731-4. PubMed ID: 20698380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision? Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of breast cancer excision by intraoperative ultrasound and marking needle - technique description and feasibility. Ivanovic NS; Zdravkovic DD; Skuric Z; Kostic J; Colakovic N; Stojiljkovic M; Opric S; Stefanovic Radovic M; Soldatovic I; Sredic B; Granic M World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 13():153. PubMed ID: 25896818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: a comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium. van der Noordaa ME; Pengel KE; Groen E; van Werkhoven E; Rutgers EJ; Loo CE; Vogel W; Vrancken Peeters MJ Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 25707349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Assessment of Margins after Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer Management. Rivere AE; Chiasson KF; Corsetti RL; Fuhrman GM Am Surg; 2016 Feb; 82(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 26874139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of positive margins after breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective review. Saadai P; Moezzi M; Menes T Breast Cancer; 2011 Jul; 18(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 21465227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins. Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound-visible breast tumors. Tafra L; Fine R; Whitworth P; Berry M; Woods J; Ekbom G; Gass J; Beitsch P; Dodge D; Han L; Potruch T; Francescatti D; Oetting L; Smith JS; Snider H; Kleban D; Chagpar A; Akbari S Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 16978950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]