These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21679730)

  • 1. In the eye of the listener: pupil dilation elucidates discourse processing.
    Zellin M; Pannekamp A; Toepel U; van der Meer E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 21679730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context- and prosody-driven ERP markers for dialog focus perception in children.
    Pannekamp A; van der Meer E; Toepel U
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Oct; 24(3-4):229-42. PubMed ID: 21761265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous but not explicit processing of positive sentences impaired in Asperger's syndrome: pupillometric evidence.
    Kuchinke L; Schneider D; Kotz SA; Jacobs AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21195104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupil Dilation Response to Prosody and Syntax During Auditory Sentence Processing.
    Aydın Ö; Uzun İP
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Feb; 52(1):153-177. PubMed ID: 35028824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-line processing of "pop-out" words in spoken French dialogues.
    Magne C; Astésano C; Lacheret-Dujour A; Morel M; Alter K; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):740-56. PubMed ID: 15904541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks.
    Klingner J; Tversky B; Hanrahan P
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Mar; 48(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 20718934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of resource allocation by intelligent individuals in linguistic, mathematical and visuo-spatial tasks.
    Lee G; Ojha A; Kang JS; Lee M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jul; 97(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 25931113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of affective significance on different levels of processing using pupil dilation in an analogical reasoning task.
    Prehn K; Heekeren HR; van der Meer E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 21044649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupillary responses on the visual backward masking task reflect general cognitive ability.
    Verney SP; Granholm E; Marshall SP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Mar; 52(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 15003370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Future versus present: time perspective and pupillary response in a relatedness judgment task investigating temporal event knowledge.
    Nowack K; Milfont TL; van der Meer E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Feb; 87(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 23276650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analyzing the pupil response due to increased cognitive demand: an independent component analysis study.
    Jainta S; Baccino T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jul; 77(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20381549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: an ERP study.
    Li XQ; Yang YF; Lu Y
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 20083152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the role of attention for the processing of emotions in speech: sex differences revisited.
    Schirmer A; Kotz SA; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 16099357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupil dilation in response preparation.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 18067982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "subjective" pupil old/new effect: is the truth plain to see?
    Montefinese M; Ambrosini E; Fairfield B; Mammarella N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 23665094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of prosodic information on the processing of split particles: ERP evidence from spoken German.
    Isel F; Alter K; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jan; 17(1):154-67. PubMed ID: 15701246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abnormal processing of emotional prosody in Williams syndrome: an event-related potentials study.
    Pinheiro AP; Galdo-Álvarez S; Rauber A; Sampaio A; Niznikiewicz M; Gonçalves OF
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(1):133-47. PubMed ID: 20961731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.