These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21681141)

  • 1. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Majid K; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
    Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transverse connectors providing increased stability to the cervical spine rod-screw construct: an in vitro human cadaveric study.
    Shaw MN; Morel EP; Utter PA; Gussous YM; Ginoux L; Berglund LJ; Gay RE; Krauss WE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 21395395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine.
    Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines.
    Papagelopoulos PJ; Currier BL; Neale PG; Hokari Y; Berglund LJ; Larson DR; Fisher DR; An KN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):13-24. PubMed ID: 12782855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of multilevel open-door laminoplasty and laminectomy on flexibility of the cervical spine: an experimental investigation.
    Kode S; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1165-70. PubMed ID: 22614794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of the C2 intralaminar fixation technique using a cross-link and offset connector for an unstable atlantoaxial joint.
    Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Wilson KW
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22405616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.