BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21681447)

  • 1. Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases.
    Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Yi A; Koo HR; Han W; Noh DY; Moon HG; Kim SJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Aug; 129(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 21681447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Value of shear wave elastrography image classification in the diagnosis of breast masses].
    Li TT; Kang CS; Li HZ; Xue JP; Yang QM; Lyu J
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 41(7):540-545. PubMed ID: 31357843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
    Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?
    Lee EJ; Jung HK; Ko KH; Lee JT; Yoon JH
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1803-11. PubMed ID: 23423637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance and color overlay pattern in shear wave elastography (SWE) for palpable breast mass.
    Park J; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Kang EY
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1943-8. PubMed ID: 26141224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast mass characterization using shear wave elastography and ultrasound.
    Hari S; Paul SB; Vidyasagar R; Dhamija E; Adarsh AD; Thulkar S; Mathur S; Sreenivas V; Sharma S; Srivastava A; Seenu V; Prashad R
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Nov; 99(11):699-707. PubMed ID: 30006125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography - Virtual touch
    Dória MT; Jales RM; Conz L; Derchain SFM; Sarian LOZ
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():74-80. PubMed ID: 30927963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements.
    Yoon JH; Ko KH; Jung HK; Lee JT
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2199-204. PubMed ID: 24041435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions.
    Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required?
    Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
    Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
    Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False positive or negative results of shear-wave elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses: analysis of clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics.
    Kim MY; Choi N; Yang JH; Yoo YB; Park KS
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 25277386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the "stiff rim" sign.
    Zhou J; Zhan W; Chang C; Zhang X; Jia Y; Dong Y; Zhou C; Sun J; Grant EG
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 24661245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions?
    Choi HJ; Ko KH; Jung HK
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2007-2014. PubMed ID: 28708299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity.
    Berg WA; Mendelson EB; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 26204299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.